Excellent · Verdica composite score based on three weighted sub-scores from public regulator data.
5 active sources · last successful refresh Oct 14, 2026
source data currentHow this is calculated
Composite = License Standing × 35% + CFPB Complaint Load × 40% + Response Quality × 25%, scaled to 300–850.Read full methodology →
Each sub-score starts at a baseline and adjusts based on real regulatory-record signals. Zero-delta rows show what we checked and confirmed clean. “Data quality” indicates how much source data informed the score.
These are unmodified public reviews from Google Reviews — not Verdica ratings or paid endorsements. Reviews shown as-published, positive and negative alike.
Get instant alerts when this score changes. Track compliance trends, export reports, and monitor up to 200 entities.
14-day free trial · No credit card required to start
Good Funding, LLC scores 830 — these providers rank higher on Verdica's composite trust score.
The Verdica score is a composite trust score from 300 to 850, computed from consumer complaint history and debt-collection licensing maintained by the CFPB and state licensing boards. A score of 830 places Good Funding, LLC in the excellent (800–850) band. The score reflects publicly available regulator data — it is not a rating from Verdica itself and does not incorporate paid reviews or advertising.
Verdica combines three weighted sub-scores drawn from the CFPB and state licensing boards. Each sub-score reflects a different dimension of collection compliance — CFPB complaint volume, resolution outcomes, and state license status — and is normalized against industry peers before being aggregated to the 300–850 scale.
Verdica pulls public records from the CFPB and state licensing boards: consumer complaint history and debt-collection licensing. Data is refreshed on rolling cycles, typically weekly to monthly depending on the source agency's own update schedule. See the "source data current" indicator on the entity page for the last successful refresh.
Common negative signals include high complaint volume, unresolved disputes, or license suspensions. Any of these appear in the underlying regulator records and pull the sub-score down; the composite reflects the weighted impact.
Believe this score is incorrect? File a dispute →
Is this your business? Claim this profile →
Me gustaria expresar mi gratitud para con Santiago Manzo ,excellent servicio y attention .Tambien con la plataforma de GOOD FUNDING.Excellent service
View on Google ReviewsShowing 7 of 126 — indexed from public Google Reviews, not filtered by rating
See all 126 reviews on Google ReviewsYes. Entities can file a dispute directly from the score page, and business owners can claim their profile. Verdica reviews disputes against the underlying regulator record; the score is updated when the source data is corrected. Scores are recomputed automatically as new regulator data arrives.
This is the third round of funding for our company. Of all the companies we have dealt with to acquire funding. Good Funding has always been on point with great clarity and integrity. Tim Rodriguez was superb in our last round of funding . Rob Daughtry
Great experience with Daniel Shertzer with Good funding! It was a seamless transaction and very helpful to get my business the loan it needed. He was also able to secure a line of credit for my business that will help with future needs.
Good Funding has the quickest, easiest process.
Daniel, excellent and fast in service, made me get my money in a short time. Thank you very much.
Highly recommend. Santiago and Jeremiah are awesome to work with! Smooth process from start to finish and got my business approved for what I had asked for.
Thank you so much Santiago. He is really efficiency through the funding process.