What Verdica's 827 score means for Alan Ferguson
Alan Ferguson's composite score of 827 out of 850 places him in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850), meaning his profile reflects strong regulatory standing and demonstrated quality in the accounting services space. A score in this range suggests minimal compliance friction with state and federal oversight bodies and clean audit records with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
For a reader evaluating whether to engage this provider, an 827 score indicates low regulatory risk. This is the second-highest confidence tier available on Verdica's scale. It does not mean perfection—the 23-point gap between 827 and a perfect 850 reflects real-world distinctions in how cleanly a provider's regulatory footprint reads—but it does mean that public records show consistent adherence to licensing, audit, and professional standards. The three independent customer reviews averaging 5.0 out of 5 align with this compliance profile, suggesting that regulatory compliance correlates with customer experience in this case.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830). This sub-score reflects Alan Ferguson's standing with the Colorado state board and any relevant credential bodies that oversee accounting professionals. A score of 830 in this category indicates that his license is current and good standing, with no record of suspension, revocation, or material restrictions. In the accounting industry, this dimension flags whether someone is legally permitted to practice and whether any past disciplinary action resulted in conditions on that license (e.g., mandatory continuing education, practice limitations, or probation). An 830 here means those conditions are absent or minimal.
PCAOB Record (810). The PCAOB is the federal regulator that oversees audit quality for publicly traded company auditors. A score of 810 reflects Alan Ferguson's history in PCAOB audit findings—either inspections or investigations. This score is slightly lower than his credentials score, which is typical; most accounting providers accumulate some minor findings during routine PCAOB inspections (deficiencies in audit documentation, sampling methodology, or control testing, for example). A 810 suggests his PCAOB record contains no major violations, no sanctions, and no pattern of serious audit failures, but may include low-severity observations that are common across the industry.
Disciplinary (850). This is a perfect sub-score, indicating no record of disciplinary actions—formal complaints, consent orders, fines, or ethics violations—in available state or federal records. This is the cleanest signal: Alan Ferguson has no documented history of misconduct findings or corrective action orders.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board registration system and the PCAOB maintain overlapping but distinct oversight functions. The state board tracks licensing status, continuing education compliance, and any complaints or disciplinary cases filed against a provider. These may range from billing disputes to ethical violations to malpractice findings. Regulators flag providers whose licenses are revoked, suspended, or subject to probation.
The PCAOB conducts triennial (or more frequent) inspections of audit firms and maintains a public database of findings. Inspections assess whether auditors followed auditing standards, tested controls appropriately, gathered sufficient evidence, and documented their work. Common findings include insufficient testing of revenue recognition, weak evaluation of management estimates, or inadequate going-concern assessment. Serious findings—such as repeated failures in the same area or failures that resulted in restated financials—can trigger enforcement action. The PCAOB also publishes enforcement decisions, which carry more weight in regulatory scoring.
A high score in both dimensions, as Ferguson demonstrates, means state licensing is clean and PCAOB inspections have not surfaced pattern issues or enforcement risk.
Bottom line
Alan Ferguson's 827 score reflects a low-risk profile with strong regulatory compliance across licensing, audit history, and disciplinary records. Someone considering this provider should verify that his license remains active in Colorado and request references or case studies specific to their accounting needs, but the regulatory checkpoints are aligned positively.