What Verdica's 649 score means for Alex Dagner
Alex Dagner's composite score of 649 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the "elevated risk" band (580–669). This grade C rating indicates that while the provider operates with valid credentials and licensing, there are compliance or quality concerns that warrant attention before engagement.
A score in this range suggests the provider meets baseline regulatory requirements but has not demonstrated strong or consistent performance across all measured dimensions. For business owners or audit committees evaluating this provider, a 649 score means due diligence is essential. This is neither a high-risk red flag nor a vote of confidence—it's a signal to dig deeper into the specific areas of concern and to verify independently whether the provider is the right fit for your accounting or audit needs.
The absence of indexed customer reviews means public feedback data is not yet available through Verdica's database, so your assessment will rely on the regulatory and licensing data shown here and on your own direct reference checks.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (320): This sub-score is notably low and represents the primary weight pulling down the composite score. A score of 320 on this dimension suggests gaps or issues in professional licensing, certifications, or credential standing in Colorado. In the accounting field, this might reflect incomplete CPA registration, lapsed certifications, or deficiencies in documented qualifications that state boards or professional organizations track. This is the area of greatest concern for this entity.
PCAOB Record (810): This sub-score is strong and indicates solid performance on Public Company Accounting Oversight Board audit quality measures. The PCAOB conducts inspections of registered audit firms and tracks compliance with auditing standards and quality control procedures. A score of 810 suggests that any PCAOB inspection findings on record have been relatively minor or well-addressed, or that the audit quality metrics tracked by the Board do not show systemic deficiencies.
Disciplinary (850): This is the highest sub-score and indicates a clean or near-clean disciplinary record. A perfect or near-perfect disciplinary score typically means no material complaints, sanctions, or enforcement actions have been recorded with the relevant state board or federal regulators. This is a positive signal that the provider has not faced serious professional misconduct findings.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board (likely the Colorado State Board of Accountancy) maintains registration records for CPAs and other licensed accounting professionals. These records document credential renewal status, any disciplinary actions, and compliance with continuing education and ethical standards.
The PCAOB, a federally mandated nonprofit, conducts annual or triennial inspections of audit firms registered with it. PCAOB inspections examine a firm's adherence to auditing and accounting standards, quality control procedures, and compliance with ethical requirements. Inspection findings can range from minor documentation gaps to serious audit quality failures, and repeat findings over multiple inspection cycles typically trigger escalated scrutiny.
Disciplinary records come from both state boards and, in some cases, the SEC or other regulatory bodies. These track substantiated complaints, consent orders, license suspensions, or other formal enforcement actions.
Verdica's scoring methodology weights these data sources to produce its composite score, using the premise that strong credentials, clean audit inspection records, and absence of discipline together indicate compliance health.
Bottom line
Alex Dagner's elevated-risk score is primarily driven by credential and licensing concerns, even though audit quality and disciplinary records are solid. Before engaging this provider, verify current licensing status directly with Colorado's state board, confirm the nature of any credential gaps, and request references from recent clients. The combination of low credentials and strong audit findings warrants clarification.