What Verdica's 656 score means for Allison Moore
Allison Moore's composite score of 656 places her in the elevated risk band (580–669), which signals a mixed compliance profile. This grade B score reflects adequate regulatory standing but with meaningful gaps that warrant attention from prospective clients or referral sources.
A score in this range typically indicates that the provider is licensed and operating, but either has documented quality or conduct issues on record, or lacks the depth of clean regulatory history that would push them into the "acceptable" or higher bands. In Allison Moore's case, the elevated score is driven primarily by a very strong PCAOB audit record (810) that is substantially offset by a significantly lower License & Credentials score (340).
For a business owner or individual considering hiring Allison Moore, a 656 score means you should proceed with informed caution. Her audit quality appears solid based on recent PCAOB data, but her licensing or professional credential status warrants direct verification before engagement. This is not a "high risk" red flag, nor is it a strong endorsement—it sits in the middle ground where due diligence is essential.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (340 / 850): This is the weakest component of Allison Moore's profile. In the accounting industry, this dimension captures whether a provider holds required state licenses, professional certifications (such as CPA status), and maintains active, unencumbered registration. A score of 340 is substantially below the acceptable threshold and suggests either missing credentials, lapsed licensing, or restrictions on current registration. Prospective clients should independently confirm that Allison Moore holds a current, active license in Connecticut and any relevant national certifications before signing an engagement letter.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): This is Allison Moore's strong point. The PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) inspects and audits the quality of work performed by accounting firms. A score of 810 indicates that recent audit findings have been limited in scope or severity, or that quality control processes and technical compliance appear solid. This suggests Allison Moore's actual accounting and audit work meets regulatory standards.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): This perfect score indicates no documented disciplinary action, complaints, or sanctions in the available state board and PCAOB records. This is a baseline positive—it means there is no history of misconduct, fraud findings, or regulatory penalties on file.
What regulators in CT track for accounting providers
Connecticut's state board of accountancy and the PCAOB maintain separate but overlapping oversight systems. The state board manages licensing, credential renewal, and investigations into professional misconduct. A low License & Credentials score typically reflects issues in this domain: unlicensed practice, expired or restricted licenses, failed continuing education requirements, or unresolved disciplinary matters at the state level.
The PCAOB, a federally chartered nonprofit, inspects the quality of audits and reviews conducted by accounting firms on public company and broker-dealer clients. Their audit findings assess compliance with auditing standards, documentation practices, and internal quality controls. A strong PCAOB score means the firm's technical work and methodology are sound.
Regulators also track whether providers have resolved prior findings, completed required remedial actions, and maintained clean compliance records over time. Scores improve or decline based on updates to these regulatory databases, typically annually or after inspections.
Bottom line
Allison Moore presents a mixed profile: credible audit quality but a meaningful licensing or credential gap that must be resolved before engagement. Anyone considering hiring her should independently verify her current Connecticut license status and any applicable certifications with the state board, and ask directly about the reason for the low credentials score. The strong disciplinary record is reassuring, but it does not offset the credential concern.