What Verdica's 820 score means for Arun Chadha
Arun Chadha's composite score of 820 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the "excellent" band (800–850), which represents the top tier of Verdica's scoring system. This score reflects a provider with strong compliance credentials, minimal regulatory friction, and a clean disciplinary record based on available PCAOB and state board data.
A score of 820 means that someone considering Arun Chadha for accounting services is looking at a provider with documented institutional rigor around audit quality and professional standards. The gap between 820 and a perfect 850 is small—just 30 points—suggesting only minor or negligible compliance concerns in the underlying regulatory record. For context, providers in the 740–799 "strong" range show solid performance but have more notable issues; anything below 740 indicates either elevated compliance risks or gaps in credential verification.
A business owner or individual evaluating Arun Chadha should interpret this score as a positive signal. However, it's important to note that Verdica's rating is based on regulatory data sources (PCAOB findings and state licensing records), not customer experience or service quality. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this provider, so the score reflects compliance posture, not client satisfaction or work output.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (810/850): This sub-score evaluates whether Arun Chadha holds valid professional licenses and meets state registration requirements. A score of 810 indicates current, valid standing with the New Jersey state board and no major credential gaps. In the accounting industry, this dimension screens for whether someone is legally authorized to practice and whether they've maintained required education or certification thresholds. A lower score here would signal expired licenses, incomplete applications, or credential disputes.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) oversees audit quality for firms that audit public companies or issuers' financial statements. This sub-score of 810 reflects how Arun Chadha's audit work—or firm's audit work—has been assessed during PCAOB inspections. The PCAOB examines audit methodology, documentation, and compliance with auditing standards. A score this high suggests inspections have not identified systemic deficiencies or serious quality control lapses. Conversely, a low PCAOB score would flag repeated audit failures, documentation issues, or violations of auditing standards.
Disciplinary (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no disciplinary actions, complaints sustained against the provider, or regulatory sanctions in the indexed data. The disciplinary dimension tracks enforcement history: complaints to state boards, settlement agreements, public reprimands, suspensions, or revocations. A perfect score here is the best possible outcome and reflects a clean public record.
What regulators in NJ track for accounting providers
New Jersey's state accounting board maintains registration and licensure records for CPAs and accounting providers. The board verifies that practitioners meet educational requirements (typically a bachelor's degree plus accounting coursework), pass the Uniform CPA Examination, and maintain continuing professional education (CPE). Licensing violations—such as failing to complete required CPE, practicing without a license, or ethical breaches—will lower compliance scores.
The PCAOB, a federal regulator, conducts periodic inspections of accounting firms to assess audit quality and compliance with auditing standards (AICPA standards and PCAOB rules). During an inspection, the PCAOB reviews selected audit engagements, assesses whether the firm has effective quality control systems, and evaluates partner competence. Findings can range from minor observations to deficiency notices that require corrective action. Severe or repeated findings damage a firm's public reputation and rating.
Both regulators publish findings and enforcement actions publicly. These become part of the Verdica scoring model to give prospective clients transparency into regulatory standing.
Bottom line
Arun Chadha's 820 score signals a compliant, well-credentialed accounting provider with no disciplinary history on record. Someone considering this provider should feel confident about regulatory standing, though they should independently verify current services offered, request client references, and confirm their specific needs align with the provider's expertise.