What Verdica's 642 score means for Austin Becker
Austin Becker's composite score of 642 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the "elevated risk" band (580–669). This means the provider meets basic regulatory thresholds but carries meaningful concerns that warrant attention before engagement.
A score in this range reflects a mixed compliance picture. The provider is not in the high-risk category (which would suggest serious red flags), but they are not in the "acceptable" band (670+) either, where most peers operate without notable friction. For a business owner or stakeholder evaluating whether to work with this provider, a 642 score signals the need for due diligence: verify that their specific service scope aligns with your audit or accounting needs, and consider whether their regulatory standing poses acceptable risk for your organization's size and complexity.
The data underlying this score comes from PCAOB audit findings and Missouri state board registration records. No independent customer reviews have been indexed yet, so the score reflects only formal regulator data, not user experience or service quality feedback.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (300 / 850): This is the lowest component of Austin Becker's profile and is the primary driver of the elevated-risk classification. A score of 300 in this dimension typically indicates gaps or concerns in professional licensure status, continuing education compliance, or credential standing with the Missouri state accounting board. In the accounting industry, a weak credentials score suggests the provider may not hold all required certifications, may have lapses in required training, or may operate under restricted or conditional registration. This is a material concern because it directly affects whether a provider is legally authorized to perform certain accounting or audit work.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): This strong sub-score reflects a relatively clean history in PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) audit findings. A score of 810 suggests the provider has not accumulated serious findings related to audit quality, financial reporting control deficiencies, or systemic compliance failures in engagements reviewed by the PCAOB. This is a positive signal that, when this provider has been examined, they have demonstrated acceptable quality control in audit execution.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): A perfect score here indicates no disciplinary actions or enforcement history on record with the Missouri state board or other tracked regulator bodies. This means there are no documented violations, complaints that resulted in formal action, or sanctions against this provider in available regulator databases.
What regulators in MO track for accounting providers
The PCAOB oversees registered public accounting firms and conducts triennial inspections to assess audit quality, control deficiencies, and compliance with auditing standards. PCAOB findings can flag issues such as inadequate testing of material accounts, weak internal quality controls, or failure to obtain sufficient audit evidence. A firm with clean PCAOB records has passed recent inspections without significant findings.
The Missouri State Board of Accountancy maintains the state CPA registry and enforces continuing professional education (CPE) requirements, experience standards, and ethics rules. The board tracks and publishes disciplinary actions—including license suspensions, revocations, and formal complaints that result in sanctions. A perfect disciplinary score means no such actions are documented.
The credentials dimension synthesizes licensing status (active, inactive, expired, or restricted), compliance with CPE hour requirements, and any conditions placed on practice authority. A weak credentials score may stem from lapses in renewal, incomplete CPE reporting, or a conditional/limited license that restricts the scope of permitted work.
Bottom line
Austin Becker's 642 score places this provider in the elevated-risk category due primarily to credential and licensing concerns, despite a clean disciplinary record and acceptable PCAOB history. Before engagement, verify current license status with the Missouri State Board of Accountancy, confirm the scope of permitted services, and clarify whether any restrictions affect your intended work. Consider this provider suitable only if their credentialing gaps do not conflict with your specific accounting or audit requirements.