What Verdica's 813 score means for Brock Podolski
Brock Podolski's composite score of 813 out of 850 places him in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850), indicating strong regulatory standing and compliance posture. This score synthesizes three dimensions of public accountability: state licensing credentials, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary records. A score this high reflects an accounting provider with documented qualifications, a clean or minimally flagged audit record, and no material disciplinary actions on file.
For a business owner or entity seeking accounting services, this score suggests low compliance risk relative to industry baselines. The provider meets or exceeds regulatory expectations across tracked dimensions. That said, a composite score is a snapshot of indexed public data; it does not predict future performance, nor does it substitute for due diligence specific to your engagement needs. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for Podolski, so Verdica's assessment is based entirely on regulator-maintained records.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (790 / 850): This sub-score reflects state board registration and professional licensing status in Colorado. A score of 790 indicates the provider holds valid, active credentials required to practice accounting in the state. The modest gap from a perfect 850 may reflect administrative flags (e.g., incomplete continuing education documentation, minor licensing status delays, or credential verification nuances), none of which appear to have escalated to disciplinary action. In the accounting industry, this sub-score typically moves downward if licenses are expired, suspended, or subject to restrictions.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains inspection records and audit quality findings for firms and individuals involved in audits of public companies. A score of 810 suggests Podolski's audit work has not triggered significant quality deficiencies in PCAOB inspections. Minor gaps from a perfect score often reflect technical audit documentation issues, sampling methodology questions, or procedural observations that did not rise to enforcement level. High scores in this dimension indicate compliance with auditing standards and regulatory expectations; low scores typically reflect repeated findings, material weaknesses, or audit failures flagged in public inspection reports.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): A perfect disciplinary score indicates no public disciplinary actions, sanctions, or enforcement findings on record with Colorado's state board or federal regulators. This is the strongest signal in Podolski's profile. Disciplinary records track violations ranging from minor (late filings, incomplete disclosures) to serious (fraud, incompetence, violation of professional standards). An 850 in this category means none of these issues appear in indexed public data.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's Division of Professions and the PCAOB jointly maintain the compliance baseline for accounting providers operating in the state. State boards verify initial licensing, ongoing continuing professional education (CPE) requirements, and fitness to practice. They track and publish disciplinary actions—including reprimands, fines, license restrictions, or revocations—stemming from complaints or investigations into ethical or technical misconduct.
The PCAOB conducts triennial (or more frequent) inspections of registered audit firms, examining quality control policies, individual audit files, and compliance with auditing standards. Inspection findings are categorized by severity and published in redacted form. Quality deficiencies, audit failures, or violations of independence rules can result in enforcement actions, escalating scrutiny, or mandatory remediation.
Verdica indexes these public records to compute scores. Factors that improve scores include clean licensing status, successful PCAOB inspections with no or minimal findings, and absence of disciplinary history. Factors that lower scores include lapses in licensing, audit quality findings, complaints, investigations, or enforcement actions.
Bottom line
Brock Podolski's 813 score reflects strong regulatory standing and represents a low-risk compliance profile based on available public data. Before engaging, verify his specific credentials align with your entity type, request references, and confirm his availability for your engagement scope—regulatory compliance is one layer of due diligence, not the complete picture.