What Verdica's 820 score means for Caroline Tedrow
Caroline Tedrow's composite score of 820 out of 850 places her in Verdica's excellent band (800–850). This means the available regulatory data—primarily PCAOB audit findings and state board registration records—shows strong compliance positioning relative to peers in the accounting provider space.
A score in this range reflects that a provider has maintained current licensing, passed PCAOB quality audits, and has no significant disciplinary flags on record. For someone evaluating an accounting provider, an 820 score suggests lower regulatory risk than the general population. However, this score is based only on third-party regulator data; it does not include independent customer reviews, which are not yet indexed for this entity. Readers should treat the score as one input—a check on regulatory standing—rather than a complete picture of service quality or fit.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (810). This sub-score reflects the status and completeness of Caroline Tedrow's professional licensing in Colorado and any credentials tracked by state boards. A score of 810 indicates that licensing requirements are met and current. A lower score in this dimension would typically signal lapses, restrictions, or incomplete credentials; a higher one suggests clean, well-maintained registration status.
PCAOB Record (810). The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board conducts quality control inspections of accounting firms and auditors. This sub-score distills findings from those audits—looking at whether audit work met professional standards, whether documentation was complete, and whether the auditor's quality control processes were sound. A score of 810 indicates that PCAOB inspections have not surfaced material deficiencies. Lower scores in this dimension often reflect findings of non-compliance with auditing standards, insufficient quality controls, or documentation issues.
Disciplinary (850). This is the highest of the three sub-scores, indicating no substantive disciplinary history in the available records. Disciplinary sub-scores drop when state boards or federal regulators take action—such as sanctions, fines, license suspensions, or findings of misconduct. A perfect or near-perfect disciplinary score means the regulator record shows no such actions.
The three sub-scores are roughly aligned, with no outliers; this consistency suggests that Caroline Tedrow's regulatory profile is stable across licensing, audit quality, and conduct dimensions.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state accounting board maintains registration and licensing records for CPAs and accounting service providers. Violations that can lower scores include failure to renew licenses on time, misrepresentation of credentials, and substantiated complaints of unethical conduct. The board may impose fines, require continuing education, or suspend licenses for serious breaches.
The PCAOB, a federally chartered nonprofit, inspects audit quality at registered firms. During inspections, PCAOB reviewers examine a sample of audit files to confirm that auditors complied with professional standards (AICPA and PCAOB rules), that audit procedures were sufficient, and that work papers were properly documented. Common findings include insufficient audit evidence, weak internal controls testing, or inadequate partner review. These findings become part of a public inspection report, which feeds into Verdica's scoring model.
Together, these two data streams—state licensure and federal audit quality—create a compliance snapshot. They do not measure customer satisfaction, pricing, turnaround time, or specialization; they measure whether an accounting provider has met baseline regulatory requirements and passed quality audits.
Bottom line
Caroline Tedrow's 820 score reflects solid regulatory standing with no flagged compliance issues in the available data. Anyone considering working with her should treat this as a green light on regulatory risk, but should also seek client references and clarify service scope, since the score does not speak to customer experience or service fit. The absence of independent reviews means additional due diligence on fit and quality is warranted.