What Verdica's 820 score means for Carrie Zippi
Carrie Zippi's composite score of 820 out of 850 places her in Verdica's excellent band (800–850). This score reflects a strong compliance profile across the dimensions Verdica measures: state licensing, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary record.
For a business owner or individual considering Carrie Zippi's services, an 820 score signals low regulatory risk based on available public data. The score is built from objective regulator records—not subjective ratings—so it reflects what state boards and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board have documented about her practice. An 820 is near the top of the range, but not perfect; the 30-point gap to a maximum 850 suggests either minor findings in one or more sub-category or a compliance posture that regulators have flagged as areas for attention, though not serious enough to move into lower score bands.
No independent customer reviews have been indexed yet, so Verdica's assessment relies entirely on regulatory data. This is a strength for readers seeking an objective compliance baseline, but it means you should supplement this score with direct reference checks and your own due diligence before engaging.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (810): This sub-score reflects Carrie Zippi's state board registration status in Oregon. A score of 810 indicates her license is current and in good standing with minimal or no recorded credential deficiencies. In the accounting industry, state licensing boards track whether practitioners maintain required CPA certifications, continuing education hours, and adherence to practice standards. A score in the 800s typically means no active suspensions, revocations, or public complaints tied to licensing violations. The 40-point differential between this score and the maximum suggests either a minor administrative finding or a historical issue that has been resolved.
PCAOB Record (810): The PCAOB audits registered accounting firms and tracks audit quality through inspections and enforcement actions. A PCAOB sub-score of 810 indicates Carrie Zippi's firm (if applicable) or her audit practice has not incurred major quality control violations or enforcement sanctions. PCAOB findings often relate to audit workpaper deficiencies, failure to comply with auditing standards, or inadequate quality reviews. A score this high suggests her audit methodology and documentation meet regulatory expectations, though not without exception.
Disciplinary (850): This is a perfect sub-score, indicating no public disciplinary actions, investigations, or sanctions on record with Oregon's state accounting board or the PCAOB. In regulatory terms, a clean disciplinary record is the baseline expectation; a perfect score here means Carrie Zippi has not been cited for ethical violations, fraud, negligence, or other misconduct that would appear in public databases.
What regulators in OR track for accounting providers
Oregon's state board and the PCAOB maintain separate but complementary oversight. The state board registers CPAs, enforces education and ethics requirements, and investigates complaints from clients or other practitioners. The PCAOB, a federally mandated body, inspects audit firms that handle public company audits and issues inspection reports and enforcement findings when quality control or auditing standard violations are detected.
Scores move based on factors such as: active licensing status and renewal compliance; audit quality inspection results; enforcement actions or settlements; findings in PCAOB inspection reports related to testing, documentation, or independence; and public disciplinary records including suspensions or ethics violations. Conversely, scores benefit from clean inspection histories, timely license renewals, and absence of public complaints or enforcement actions.
Bottom line
Carrie Zippi's 820 score indicates she represents low compliance risk based on available regulatory data and is suitable for consideration by clients seeking established, licensed providers. Before engaging, verify the score's context by checking her firm's size, service scope, and client references, and confirm Oregon's public license database independently.