What Verdica's 656 score means for Dana Shaw
Dana Shaw's composite score of 656 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the "elevated risk" band (580–669). This means the entity shows mixed compliance signals: some areas meet baseline standards, while others warrant closer attention before engaging their services.
A score in this range suggests the provider is functioning and registered but carries compliance concerns that are material enough to flag. This is neither a disqualification nor a clean bill of health. For a business owner or individual considering Dana Shaw for accounting services, the score indicates you should conduct additional due diligence—review references, verify specific service offerings, and clarify what regulatory actions (if any) are part of the public record—before making a final decision.
The lack of indexed customer reviews means Verdica has no independent feedback on file yet, so you'll need to seek references directly from the provider or through your professional network.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (340 out of 850): This is the lowest sub-score and reflects gaps in licensing, certifications, or state board registration standing. In the accounting field, this dimension captures whether an individual holds required CPAs, active state licenses, or meets continuing education standards. A score of 340 suggests material shortfalls—either missing credentials, lapsed licenses, or incomplete registration status—that would typically result in restricted ability to offer certain services. This is the primary driver of the elevated overall score.
PCAOB Record (810 out of 850): This is the strongest sub-score and reflects a favorable audit inspection history. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inspects registered firms and auditors; a score of 810 indicates few or no significant findings in PCAOB audit inspections. This suggests Dana Shaw has demonstrated competence in audit execution and quality control on inspected engagements. This sub-score partially offsets concerns in other dimensions.
Disciplinary (850 out of 850): This is the highest possible score and means no disciplinary history is indexed in Verdica's data sources. No state board sanctions, complaints upheld, or enforcement actions appear on the public record. This is a positive signal and reflects a clean disciplinary history.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board tracks licensing status, active registration, and disciplinary actions through the state accountancy board. Violations that lower scores include failure to renew licenses, disciplinary complaints (fraud, negligence, incompetence), settlement agreements, and failure to meet continuing professional education (CPE) requirements.
The PCAOB, a federally mandated regulator, conducts triennial and periodic inspections of accounting firms. PCAOB findings focus on audit quality, workpaper documentation, partner engagement reviews, and compliance with auditing standards. Repeated findings, especially in areas like revenue recognition or internal control assessment, lower PCAOB scores. Firms with clean or minimal inspection histories, as Dana Shaw appears to have, score highly on this dimension.
Together, these sources create a three-lens view: Are you licensed and credentialed? Do your audits meet quality standards? Do you have a clean disciplinary record? A gap in any lens raises risk.
Bottom line
Dana Shaw scores in the elevated-risk band primarily due to licensing and credential gaps, despite a strong audit inspection history and clean disciplinary record. Before engaging this provider, verify current license status directly with Colorado's board, request references from recent clients, and clarify which services they are licensed to provide. The mixed profile warrants caution but not automatic rejection.