What Verdica's 803 score means for Daniel Korotkin
Daniel Korotkin's composite score of 803 out of 850 places him in Verdica's excellent band (800–850), indicating strong overall compliance standing across the measured dimensions. This score reflects regulatory data aggregated from PCAOB audit findings and Colorado state board registration records—the primary sources regulators use to assess accounting provider quality and trustworthiness.
A score at this level means the provider has demonstrated consistent adherence to professional standards in the areas Verdica tracks. Readers should interpret this as a green signal that Korotkin's public compliance record does not show patterns of material concern. However, the score is not a guarantee of service quality or fit for a specific engagement; it reflects past regulatory performance, not current client satisfaction or specialization. Since no independent customer reviews are indexed yet, the rating is based entirely on official regulator data.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (760/850): This sub-score measures whether Korotkin holds valid, current licenses and certifications required to practice accounting in Colorado and whether any restrictions or conditions attach to those credentials. A score of 760 is strong but slightly below the excellent threshold, suggesting the underlying credentials are in order with no major red flags, though there may be minor documentation notes or non-material compliance items on record.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains records on audit quality, inspection findings, and any quality control deficiencies identified during inspections of firms. Korotkin's score of 810 reflects a solid track record in PCAOB oversight. Scores in this range typically indicate that any audit findings or quality notes on file are not severe or recurring; minor technical observations may exist, but they do not suggest systemic audit quality problems.
Disciplinary (850/850): A perfect score here means no disciplinary actions, sanctions, or complaints are recorded against Korotkin by the Colorado state board, PCAOB, or other relevant regulators within Verdica's data scope. This is the strongest possible signal on this dimension—a clean disciplinary record is a baseline expectation for accounting providers and a necessary (though not sufficient) condition for professional trust.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board of accountancy and the PCAOB together create the regulatory framework that shapes these sub-scores. The state board monitors licensing status, continuing education compliance, and any formal complaints or disciplinary actions. The PCAOB, which oversees auditors of public companies, conducts periodic inspections to assess audit quality, independence, and adherence to auditing standards. PCAOB findings can range from technical observations to significant quality control deficiencies; they are a primary driver of the PCAOB Record sub-score.
Infractions that lower scores include unresolved complaints, suspended or revoked licenses, documented audit quality failures, lack of required continuing education, independence violations, and substantiated disciplinary decisions. Conversely, clear licensing status, responsive audit quality, and absence of complaints keep scores in the acceptable to excellent range. The PCAOB also tracks whether firms have adequate quality control systems and whether partners are compliant with professional standards.
Bottom line
Korotkin's 803 score indicates a strong compliance profile with no disciplinary history and solid regulatory standing. Before engaging his services, verify his specific credentials align with your accounting need (tax, audit, forensic, bookkeeping), confirm his current license status independently, and if possible, request references or prior client feedback to supplement the regulator-based score.