What Verdica's 827 score means for Daniel Rice
Verdica's composite score of 827 out of 850 places Daniel Rice in the "excellent" range (800–850), the highest performance band. This score reflects the aggregated assessment of three regulatory compliance dimensions: professional licensing, audit quality history, and disciplinary record. A score at this level indicates that Daniel Rice meets or exceeds the baseline standards regulators expect from accounting providers in Colorado and demonstrates strong alignment with professional oversight frameworks.
For a reader evaluating Daniel Rice, a score of 827 signals low regulatory risk. The margin from the maximum (23 points) is modest and typical even among top-performing providers; perfect compliance across all measured dimensions is rare in any regulated profession. This score does not mean the provider is without any historical findings or infractions—it means any issues that exist have been resolved or are minor enough not to materially affect the overall compliance profile. Someone considering Daniel Rice for accounting services can reasonably expect a provider with solid credentials, clean audit results relative to peers, and no serious disciplinary action on record.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830/850): This sub-score reflects Daniel Rice's standing with Colorado's state board registration and the validity of professional licenses and certifications required to practice as an accounting provider. A score of 830 indicates the provider holds current, active credentials with no major gaps, lapses, or restrictions. A high license score typically means the provider has renewed on schedule, paid required fees, and met continuing education or competency requirements mandated by the state. A low score in this dimension would flag expired licenses, restricted certifications, or pending license actions—all red flags for consumer protection.
PCAOB Record (810/850): This reflects Daniel Rice's audit quality findings under the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which inspects and regulates CPA firms that audit public companies. The PCAOB uses detailed audit procedures to evaluate whether firms maintain sufficient quality controls, independence, and adherence to auditing standards. A score of 810 indicates a reasonable audit track record; any PCAOB findings (quality control weaknesses, sampling deficiencies, or documentation gaps) have been either minor or addressed. A low PCAOB score would suggest recurring audit quality issues or unresolved deficiencies flagged by federal inspectors.
Disciplinary (850/850): This is a perfect sub-score, reflecting no substantive disciplinary history recorded with state or federal regulators. In the accounting profession, disciplinary actions include complaints upheld by state boards, settlements with the SEC or PCAOB, license suspensions, or sanctions for fraud, negligence, or ethical violations. A perfect disciplinary score does not guarantee the provider has never been challenged—it means no official, sustained disciplinary findings are indexed in the regulatory databases Verdica monitors.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB maintain oversight through registration databases and audit inspection protocols. State boards verify that providers maintain proper licenses, complete required education, and meet ethical standards under the Accountancy Act. When complaints are filed, state investigators evaluate claims of incompetence, fraud, or violation of professional rules; substantiated complaints result in disciplinary records.
The PCAOB, a congressionally created nonprofit, conducts triennial inspections of firms auditing public companies. Inspectors test whether audits complied with Professional Standards, whether the firm's quality control systems are effective, and whether personnel demonstrated sufficient expertise. Findings are documented in public inspection reports. Recurring or unresolved deficiencies can escalate to enforcement action.
These regulator sources allow Verdica to assess ongoing compliance without relying on self-reported data or anecdotal reviews alone.
Bottom line
Daniel Rice's score of 827 reflects a provider in strong regulatory standing with valid credentials, a reasonable PCAOB audit history, and a clean disciplinary record. Someone considering engagement should verify that Daniel Rice's specific services align with their needs and confirm current insurance and references, but the regulatory profile presents low compliance risk.