What Verdica's 827 score means for David Fry
David Fry's composite score of 827 out of 850 places him in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This means his profile reflects strong alignment with regulatory standards across the dimensions Verdica tracks: professional credentials, audit quality, and disciplinary history.
A score in this range signals that an accounting provider has maintained compliance with state licensing requirements and has not accumulated significant findings or disciplinary actions from the regulators who oversee public company audits. For someone evaluating David Fry as an accounting provider, this score suggests low compliance risk relative to the universe of practitioners. That said, the score reflects only what regulators have documented—it does not speak to service quality, pricing, specialization, or customer satisfaction. The absence of customer reviews in Verdica's index means this profile cannot yet be triangulated against client experience data, which is a limitation worth noting.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830): This sub-score reflects David Fry's standing with the Colorado state board and his active professional licenses or certifications. A score of 830 in this category indicates that his credentials are current and in good standing. In the accounting profession, this typically means a CPA license has been maintained without lapse, continuing education requirements have been met, and there are no flags from the state licensing authority. A lower score in this dimension would suggest inactive licenses, failed renewals, or credential restrictions.
PCAOB Record (810): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains records of audit inspections and findings for firms that audit public companies. David Fry's score of 810 here reflects the results of PCAOB oversight activities. A score in this range suggests that any audit findings documented by PCAOB have been relatively modest in scope or have been remediated. PCAOB inspections typically identify deficiencies in audit methodology, documentation, or technical application; a higher score in this dimension reflects fewer or less severe findings. A significantly lower score would indicate recurring audit quality issues.
Disciplinary (850): This is a perfect sub-score, indicating no disciplinary actions have been recorded by the relevant regulators. In accounting, disciplinary records include formal complaints, sanctions, suspensions, or enforcement actions issued by state boards or professional bodies. A score of 850 means there is no documented history of such actions against David Fry. This is the most straightforward sub-score to interpret: it reflects a clean compliance record with respect to formal regulatory discipline.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB together maintain the regulatory infrastructure that Verdica indexes for this profile. The state board tracks licensing status, continuing professional education completion, and any complaints or disciplinary matters filed by clients or other practitioners. The PCAOB, a federally mandated authority, conducts periodic inspections of firms that audit public companies. These inspections examine audit workpapers, engagement quality reviews, and compliance with auditing standards. PCAOB findings might note areas such as insufficient evidence collection, inadequate testing of management assertions, or failure to apply relevant accounting standards. Both regulators publish findings and disciplinary orders as public records, which feed into Verdica's scoring model. Scores move based on the frequency and severity of findings, the timeliness of remediation, and the absence or presence of disciplinary history.
Bottom line
David Fry's score of 827 indicates strong regulatory compliance and a clean disciplinary record—he is not a watch-list provider. Before engaging him, consider requesting references from clients in your industry and confirming his specific experience with your company's accounting needs, since the compliance score does not address service fit or performance depth.