What Verdica's 649 score means for Denise Hunt
Denise Hunt's composite score of 649 out of 850 places her in the elevated-risk band (580–669). This means her profile shows mixed compliance signals that warrant attention before engagement. The score reflects what regulators and available data reveal about her licensing status, audit record, and disciplinary history combined into a single metric.
A score of 649 is notably below the acceptable threshold (670+), which is the minimum point where most compliance frameworks consider a provider operationally sound without additional scrutiny. For a business owner or individual considering Denise Hunt's services, this score should trigger a conversation: it's not a disqualification, but it's a signal to ask specific questions and verify credentials independently before signing an engagement letter.
No independent customer reviews have been indexed yet, so this assessment relies entirely on regulatory data—the most objective foundation available, but incomplete without operational context.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (320/850): This is a major concern. A sub-score of 320 indicates significant gaps or issues in professional licensing or credential standing. In accounting, this typically means either a lapsed or restricted license, missing required certifications, or state board registration gaps. This score pulls the overall composite down substantially and should be a primary focus for anyone considering retention.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board score of 810 is strong. This reflects audit quality and compliance findings from PCAOB inspections or enforcement records. A score this high suggests that when Denise Hunt has been subject to PCAOB oversight, audit work has generally met quality standards, or no significant deficiencies were cited. This is the only sub-score that supports confidence.
Disciplinary (850/850): A perfect score here means no substantive disciplinary actions, sanctions, or complaints are recorded in the state board database or PCAOB records. This is positive and suggests a clean enforcement history—at least in the records tracked.
The tension between sub-scores is telling: credentials are weak, but audit quality and discipline records are clean. This pattern might indicate someone who can perform work competently in areas regulated by PCAOB, but whose professional licensing or standing is incomplete or outdated.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board (and the PCAOB at the federal level) monitor several key dimensions:
Licensing & Credentials: State boards verify that practitioners hold required CPA licenses, maintain continuing education, and meet ongoing registration standards. A low score here could mean a license lapsed, wasn't renewed, or was never obtained despite offering services that require it.
PCAOB Audit Findings: The PCAOB conducts inspections of firms that audit public companies. They assess audit documentation, professional standards compliance, and quality control. Findings become part of a firm's public record. A high PCAOB score indicates audit engagements met professional standards; a low one would flag deficient working papers, inadequate evidence gathering, or violations of auditing standards.
Disciplinary Records: State boards and PCAOB track complaints, investigations, and sanctions. These might include failure to follow accounting standards, commingling client funds, missed filing deadlines, or ethical violations. A perfect discipline score means none of this has occurred—or at least isn't documented.
Bottom line
Denise Hunt's 649 score reflects elevated risk primarily due to weak credentials, despite a strong audit record and clean discipline history. Before engaging her services, verify her current Colorado CPA license status, confirm the scope of work she's credentialed to perform, and understand what specific licensing gaps are driving the low credentials sub-score. The clean disciplinary record is reassuring, but credential issues are structural—not operational—and can't be overlooked.