What Verdica's 656 score means for Denise Jurgens
Denise Jurgens holds a composite compliance score of 656 out of 850, placing her in the "elevated risk" band (580–669). This score reflects a mixed compliance profile: while her PCAOB audit record is strong, her licensing and credentials assessment pulls the overall rating down into a range that warrants closer attention before engagement.
A score of 656 means this provider is above the high-risk threshold but below the "acceptable" benchmark. For a business owner or consumer evaluating accounting services, this suggests Denise Jurgens has not raised significant regulatory red flags—but there are credentials or licensing gaps worth understanding. The elevated classification does not mean she is unlicensed or unqualified; rather, it signals incomplete or outdated credential documentation relative to Colorado's state board and PCAOB standards. Before hiring, you should verify current license status directly with the Colorado State Board of Accountancy and confirm any recent PCAOB findings yourself.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (340 / 850): This is the primary driver of the lower composite score. A sub-score of 340 indicates substantial gaps in credential documentation or licensing standing as tracked by Colorado's state board registration system. This dimension measures whether an accountant holds required certifications (CPA, CFA, etc.), maintains current licenses, and keeps registration records up to date. A score this low typically signals missing, expired, or unverified credentials rather than active disciplinary action. Before using this provider's services, confirm directly with Colorado that all necessary licenses are current.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): This is Denise Jurgens's strongest dimension. The PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) inspects accounting firms that audit public companies and enforces quality standards. A score of 810 reflects a clean or minimally flagged audit record. This suggests her work has not triggered major quality deficiencies or inspection findings in PCAOB reviews. For accounting services, this is a positive indicator—it means regulators have not documented significant audit failures or client protection issues in her recent history.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): A perfect disciplinary score means no formal complaints, sanctions, or misconduct findings have been recorded by Colorado's state board or the PCAOB. This indicates no history of ethical violations, fraud findings, or regulatory penalties. A perfect score in this dimension is straightforward: her disciplinary record is clean.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB maintain overlapping but distinct compliance tracks:
The state board registration system verifies that accountants meet education, examination, and continuing education requirements for licensure. It flags expired licenses, incomplete applications, and credential mismatches. A low score in this dimension often reflects administrative gaps—missing renewal paperwork, incomplete CE documentation, or registration lapses—rather than incompetence or misconduct.
The PCAOB audit findings assess the quality and compliance of work performed on public company audits. Inspectors review engagement files, test sampling, and audit procedures. Common findings include inadequate audit scope, insufficient evidence collection, or deficient internal controls testing. A high PCAOB score means inspections have not uncovered systemic quality problems.
Together, these data sources create a picture of both licensing status and work quality. A provider can have clean audit findings but licensing issues (as appears to be the case here), or vice versa. Colorado regulators also track disciplinary histories—complaints, consent orders, and enforcement actions—to identify ethical or professional misconduct.
Bottom line
Denise Jurgens is not a high-risk provider, but her elevated score warrants verification. Before engaging, confirm her current Colorado accounting license directly with the state board, review what specific credentials are missing from her file, and cross-check her PCAOB inspection record on the PCAOB website. Her clean disciplinary and audit history are positive signals, but the credential gaps must be resolved before moving forward.