What Verdica's 820 score means for Emily Matthews
Emily Matthews holds a composite compliance score of 820 out of 850, placing her in the excellent band (800–850). This score reflects strong regulatory standing across the dimensions Verdica tracks: licensing credentials, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary record.
A score in this range signals that an accounting provider has demonstrated consistent adherence to professional and regulatory standards as measured by public records. For a business owner or client evaluating Matthews, an 820 score indicates a low-risk profile based on available regulatory data. The gap between this score and the theoretical maximum of 850 suggests minor findings or variance in one or more dimensions, rather than any serious compliance concern.
Readers should interpret this as: Matthews operates within the framework that regulators and industry bodies expect. This does not guarantee perfect outcomes on every engagement, but it does mean her professional record shows compliance with established rules and audit standards. No independent customer reviews are yet indexed for this entity, so the score reflects only regulatory and credentialing data sources, not client experience or service quality.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (810/850): This sub-score reflects Matthews' standing with the Colorado state board and her professional licensing status. A score of 810 in this dimension indicates that her license is current and that her educational and certification credentials meet state requirements. It does not signal any lapses, suspensions, or unmet continuing education requirements. The 40-point gap from perfect suggests either a minor administrative variance, an older finding now resolved, or a standard deviation in how the data was recorded—but nothing indicative of active licensing concern.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains audit quality and inspection records for firms and auditors who work on public company filings. Matthews' score of 810 in this dimension means her audit work, as sampled by PCAOB inspections, has not revealed material deficiencies. PCAOB inspections examine whether audits were conducted in accordance with PCAOB standards and whether the auditor identified and addressed risks appropriately. A score this high reflects acceptable or better performance in those quality assessments. The slight variance from maximum may reflect findings in routine inspections that were either immaterial or have since been corrected.
Disciplinary (850/850): This is a perfect sub-score, indicating no adverse disciplinary action on record with the Colorado state board or other indexed regulatory bodies. This dimension tracks formal complaints, violations, enforcement actions, or sanctions issued by state licensing authorities. A perfect score here means Matthews has not faced formal disciplinary proceedings that resulted in public findings against her.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's accounting board oversees licensure, continuing education compliance, and ethical conduct for CPAs and accounting professionals. The board maintains records of current licenses, renewal status, and any formal disciplinary actions. State regulators can impose sanctions ranging from warnings to license suspension or revocation if a provider violates professional standards or state regulations.
The PCAOB, as a federal regulator, conducts annual or triennial inspections of audit firms. These inspections examine audit documentation, engagement quality, and compliance with auditing standards. The PCAOB issues inspection reports that identify deficiencies at the firm or individual auditor level. These findings become part of the public record and directly influence perceptions of audit quality. Low PCAOB findings correlate with consistent methodology and risk identification; significant findings can signal training gaps or quality control weaknesses.
Together, these sources create a baseline accountability structure: state boards enforce licensing and ethics, while PCAOB enforces audit quality for public company work.
Bottom line
Emily Matthews' 820 score places her in a strong compliance position based on regulatory records. A prospective client should verify that her services align with their specific accounting needs and independently confirm any references—but the regulatory data available shows no red flags. Cross-check her current license status and request client references to complement the compliance picture.