What Verdica's 827 score means for Eswardia Bohre
Eswardia Bohre scores 827 out of 850 on Verdica's composite assessment, placing it in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a provider with strong regulatory standing across the dimensions Verdica tracks: professional licensing, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary records.
A score in this range indicates that Eswardia Bohre has demonstrated compliance with federal and state accounting standards as measured by available regulatory data. For a business owner or audit committee evaluating an accounting provider, an 827 score suggests lower regulatory risk relative to the broader population of firms. That said, the score is not a full operational audit—it reflects what regulators and public databases show, not customer experience, responsiveness, or technical competency in your specific industry.
The fact that no independent customer reviews are indexed yet means Verdica's rating relies entirely on regulatory filings and licensing records. This is neither a strength nor weakness; it simply means the data foundation is regulatory rather than experiential. Readers should treat this score as one input in a broader due diligence process, alongside references, client interviews, and service agreements.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830): This sub-score reflects Eswardia Bohre's standing with the New Jersey state board of accountancy and relevant professional certifications. A score of 830 out of 850 indicates the provider holds active licenses and meets state renewal and continuing education requirements. Scores in this range typically mean no material licensing suspensions, revocations, or pending disciplinary actions at the state level. Minor or resolved administrative issues may slightly reduce the score from a perfect 850, but the firm remains fully authorized to practice.
PCAOB Record (810): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board audits and inspects registered audit firms. This sub-score reflects the findings from PCAOB inspection reports, which assess audit quality, compliance with standards, and adherence to regulatory requirements. A score of 810 suggests Eswardia Bohre has passed PCAOB inspections without material findings, or any findings were resolved satisfactorily. Lower PCAOB scores typically indicate unresolved quality deficiencies, repeated violations across engagements, or failure to remediate prior inspection findings.
Disciplinary (850): A perfect score on this dimension means Verdica found no record of disciplinary actions—whether from the SEC, state boards, or the PCAOB—in its indexed data. This indicates no formal complaints, sanctions, or enforcement proceedings during the periods covered by available regulatory databases. A lower disciplinary score would reflect substantiated violations, fines, or consent orders.
What regulators in NJ track for accounting providers
The PCAOB conducts triennial inspections of mid-size and larger audit firms and annual inspections of the largest four firms. Inspections examine audit file documentation, independence compliance, quality controls, and adherence to auditing standards. If inspectors identify deficiencies, firms must develop remediation plans and demonstrate corrective action in follow-up inspections.
New Jersey's state board of accountancy issues and renews CPA licenses, enforces the state Accountancy Act, and investigates complaints. They track continuing professional education hours, monitor for unlicensed practice, and may discipline licensees for ethical violations, incompetence, or fraud. State board actions include censure, fines, license suspension, or revocation.
The SEC also oversees accounting firms for violations of federal securities laws, though enforcement actions are less common than state or PCAOB findings.
Bottom line
Eswardia Bohre presents an excellent regulatory profile based on available licensing and audit inspection data. Before engaging the firm, verify that their service offerings match your specific needs and confirm references with existing clients—regulatory compliance is a necessary but not sufficient basis for selecting an accounting provider.