What Verdica's 827 score means for G. Runnion
G. Runnion's composite score of 827 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the excellent band (800–850), indicating strong regulatory standing and demonstrated compliance with professional standards. This score reflects performance across three measured dimensions: licensing credentials, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary record.
For a business owner or entity considering G. Runnion's services, this score signals low compliance risk. The provider has met or exceeded baseline regulatory expectations and has not accumulated significant red flags in the systems tracked by Verdica. However, the score is not perfect—the 23-point gap from the maximum reflects some measurable variance in one or more underlying sub-categories, which is typical even among high-performing firms.
Readers should interpret this as a favorable indicator of professional standing, but not as a guarantee of service quality or fit for a specific engagement. The Verdica score measures regulatory compliance and historical audit performance, not client satisfaction, technical expertise in a particular domain, or pricing competitiveness.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830/850): This sub-score reflects G. Runnion's standing with state licensing boards and credential verification systems in Colorado. A score of 830 indicates the provider holds active licenses and required certifications in good standing, with minimal or no compliance gaps in credential maintenance. In the accounting industry, this dimension typically flags providers with lapsed licenses, credential suspensions, or incomplete continuing education requirements—none of which appear to apply here. The 20-point gap from perfect suggests either very minor administrative issues or conservative scoring methodology.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains inspection records and audit quality findings for firms that audit public companies. A score of 810 indicates G. Runnion's audits have met PCAOB standards without major deficiencies. Lower scores in this category typically reflect identified audit quality control issues, documentation failures, or repeated findings across inspection cycles. The 40-point gap here is more material and suggests some audit-related observations, though not at a level that would trigger enforcement action or public sanctions.
Disciplinary (850/850): This perfect score indicates no regulatory sanctions, complaints substantiated by state boards, or disciplinary actions on record in Colorado's system. For context, lower scores would reflect issues such as complaints from clients, violations of professional conduct rules, or enforcement actions by state licensing authorities. A perfect disciplinary score is meaningful because it shows the provider has not attracted regulatory attention for misconduct.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB monitor accounting providers through two primary lenses:
State Board Registration focuses on licensing status, continuing education compliance, firm structure and ownership, and adherence to professional conduct rules. Violations might include operating without a license, failing to renew credentials, or breaching client confidentiality or independence rules.
PCAOB Audit Findings examine the quality of audit work performed on public company financial statements. Inspectors review selected audits to assess compliance with auditing standards, adequacy of evidence gathering, appropriateness of judgments, and effectiveness of quality control procedures. Repeated or serious findings can lead to restrictions on the firm's public company audit practice.
Together, these systems track both the provider's right to operate and the quality of their actual audit work—providing a more complete picture than licensing alone.
Bottom line
G. Runnion scores in the excellent compliance band with no disciplinary history and strong regulatory standing. A prospective client should verify that the provider's expertise aligns with their specific audit or accounting needs and confirm insurance coverage and engagement terms directly—the Verdica score does not substitute for these checks.