What Verdica's 656 score means for Gary May
Gary May's composite score of 656 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the "elevated" risk band (580–669). This means the provider meets baseline regulatory requirements but carries measurable concerns that warrant due diligence before engagement.
A score in this band reflects mixed performance across compliance dimensions. It's neither a red flag that demands immediate avoidance nor a green light for unguarded trust. For business owners or audit committees evaluating Gary May, the 656 score signals: proceed with awareness. The provider is active and registered, but the score suggests gaps or issues serious enough to pull the overall rating below the "acceptable" threshold (670+).
No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so Verdica's assessment is based entirely on regulatory data from the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and Colorado state board records. This means you're seeing a compliance-only snapshot, not a full market reputation picture.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials: 340/850
This is the weakest component of Gary May's profile. A sub-score of 340 typically reflects gaps or issues in professional licensing, registration status, continuing education compliance, or credential currency. In the accounting field, this dimension measures whether a provider holds active, unrestricted licenses and meets state-mandated qualification thresholds. A score this low suggests either unresolved licensing deficiencies, credential lapses, or compliance gaps with Colorado's registration requirements. This is the primary driver pulling the overall score into elevated-risk territory.
PCAOB Record: 810/850
The PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) sub-score of 810 is substantially stronger. This reflects audit quality and inspection findings over time. A score of 810 indicates the provider has largely avoided major audit deficiencies, quality control failures, or inspection sanctions. While not perfect (excellent would be 800+), this suggests Gary May's actual audit work and internal processes meet PCAOB standards reasonably well.
Disciplinary: 850/850
A perfect disciplinary score means no material sanctions, complaints, or enforcement actions recorded in available state or federal regulatory databases. This is a positive signal—it suggests the provider has not been publicly disciplined or subject to board action.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB monitor accounting providers across several dimensions:
PCAOB audits examine the quality of financial statement audits, independence compliance, and internal quality controls. Inspectors review completed audits for technical errors, missed red flags, or violations of auditing standards. Findings can range from minor documentation gaps to serious deficiencies that signal systemic problems.
State board registration enforces licensing requirements, including CPA credentials, continuing professional education (CPE) hours, and good-standing status. Providers must maintain active registration and comply with annual renewal and CPE obligations. Lapses here can trigger license suspension or revocation.
Disciplinary records capture formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions issued by either the state board or PCAOB. Common infractions include independence violations, inadequate audit procedures, or failure to maintain competence.
Verdica's scoring model weights these dimensions to reflect their importance to audit quality and regulatory compliance. A weak licensing score paired with strong audit findings suggests the provider performs quality work but may have administrative or credential compliance issues.
Bottom line
Gary May presents an elevated-risk profile, primarily driven by licensing or credential concerns that outweigh otherwise acceptable audit quality. Before engaging this provider, verify current license status with Colorado's board, confirm credential compliance, and understand what underlying licensing issues prompted the 340 sub-score. The strong disciplinary record is reassuring, but it does not offset the credential gap.