What Verdica's 766 score means for Habif Arogeti & Wynne
Habif Arogeti & Wynne's composite score of 766 out of 850 places the firm in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating above-average compliance and regulatory standing. This score reflects a firm that meets core licensing and disciplinary standards while showing some room for improvement in audit quality metrics tracked by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
A score in this range signals that the firm is unlikely to present elevated compliance risk to clients or regulators. However, it is not in the "excellent" tier (800–850), which would suggest minimal regulatory concerns. For a business owner or financial decision-maker evaluating this provider, a 766 score suggests solid credentials and a clean disciplinary record, but the PCAOB audit findings component warrants attention during due diligence.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (850/850): This perfect sub-score indicates that Habif Arogeti & Wynne holds all required state board registrations and professional licenses in Connecticut without deficiency. The firm is current on all credential maintenance and registration obligations that the state mandates. This is the baseline expectation for any active accounting provider and reflects no licensing violations or lapses.
Disciplinary (850/850): A perfect disciplinary score means the firm has no record of formal sanctions, complaints upheld against it, or corrective orders from the Connecticut state board or other regulators within the timeframe tracked by Verdica. This is a strong positive signal that the firm operates without a pattern of regulatory friction or enforcement action.
PCAOB Record (640/850): This is the material factor pulling the overall composite score below the "excellent" range. The PCAOB, which oversees auditors of publicly traded companies, has identified findings related to this firm's audit work. A score of 640 in this dimension is below the "strong" threshold but above "elevated risk." PCAOB findings typically cover audit quality issues—such as insufficient evidence gathering, inadequate testing of key assertions, or documentation gaps—rather than fraud or intentional misconduct. This sub-score suggests the firm has room to improve audit methodology, execution, or quality controls.
What regulators in CT track for accounting providers
Connecticut's state board of accountancy maintains registration records and disciplines firms for violations of professional standards. Verdica indexes these records to assess whether a provider is currently licensed, has experienced license suspensions, revocations, or has faced upheld complaints. Licensing and disciplinary data are the most reliable public signals of regulatory standing.
The PCAOB, established under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, conducts inspections of accounting firms that audit public companies. PCAOB audit findings documents are issued when inspectors identify deficiencies in an audit file or firm quality controls. Common findings include inadequate audit procedures, insufficient testing of material account balances, weak internal quality monitoring, or documentation that does not support audit conclusions. These findings do not automatically result in enforcement action but signal audit quality gaps. A firm with PCAOB findings may still be permitted to practice; however, regulators expect remediation plans.
Verdica's scoring methodology weights all three dimensions to produce a composite picture: strong licensing and discipline record are necessary but not sufficient on their own. Audit quality—measured via PCAOB findings—adds a layer of inspection-based data that reflects actual work performed.
Bottom line
Habif Arogeti & Wynne is a strong provider with clean licensing and disciplinary records but with some documented audit quality findings that merit scrutiny. Before engaging, request information about the firm's remediation steps related to PCAOB findings and confirm that audit procedures and quality controls align with your organization's risk tolerance.