What Verdica's 733 score means for Haddox Reid Eubank Betts
Haddox Reid Eubank Betts scores 733 out of 850 on Verdica's composite scale, placing it in the "acceptable" band (670–739). This grade indicates that the firm meets baseline regulatory and professional standards but has room for improvement in certain compliance dimensions. A reader should interpret this as: the firm is broadly compliant and carries no obvious red flags, but it is not yet operating at the "strong" or "excellent" level that firms in higher bands demonstrate.
The score reflects a firm that operates within acceptable regulatory boundaries based on available PCAOB audit findings and Tennessee state board registration data. There are no customer reviews indexed yet, so the assessment rests entirely on public regulatory records. For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, the 733 score suggests due diligence is warranted—the firm is not disqualified, but you should verify specific credentials and service fit before engagement.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (640): This sub-score reflects the firm's standing on state registration and formal licensing requirements in Tennessee. A score of 640 sits in the lower-acceptable range, suggesting the firm holds required credentials but may have licensing gaps, historical compliance notes, or registration issues that regulators flagged. In the accounting field, this dimension captures whether a firm and its partners maintain active, unrestricted licenses and meet continuing education or registration renewal standards.
PCAOB Record (740): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) score of 740 is in the strong band. This reflects the firm's performance on PCAOB audit inspections and quality reviews. A score this high indicates that the firm has generally passed inspection protocols and has not accumulated significant findings related to audit quality, documentation, or compliance with auditing standards. However, it is not perfect, suggesting minor or resolved issues may exist in the PCAOB's file.
Disciplinary (850): This perfect sub-score reflects an absence of material disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions on record with Tennessee's state accounting board or related regulators. A score of 850 means the firm has a clean disciplinary history—no suspensions, revocations, fines, or formal complaints are indexed in the underlying data.
The profile emerges as a firm with solid disciplinary standing and acceptable PCAOB quality, but with some friction in its licensing or credential footprint. The disciplinary strength suggests the firm operates ethically and avoids regulatory violations, while the lower License & Credentials score warrants clarification.
What regulators in TN track for accounting providers
Tennessee's state board and the PCAOB monitor accounting firms across several dimensions. State registration validates that firms and individual CPAs hold active licenses, maintain required insurance, and comply with continuing professional education (CPE) requirements. Failures in this area—lapses in renewal, incomplete CPE, or disciplinary notes—lower a firm's credential score.
PCAOB audit inspections assess whether firms follow auditing standards, maintain adequate documentation, and deliver quality work on public company audits. Inspectors review a sample of engagements and report findings on areas such as audit procedures, evidence collection, and compliance with standards like PCAS or AICPA guidance. Repeated or severe findings move scores down; clean inspections move scores up.
Disciplinary records track formal actions: complaints, investigations, sanctions, license restrictions, or settlements with regulators or professional boards. A clean disciplinary record means the firm has not been formally charged or sanctioned for violations of professional conduct, fraud, or regulatory breaches.
These three pillars—licensing, audit quality, and disciplinary history—form the foundation of public accountability for accounting firms in Tennessee.
Bottom line
Haddox Reid Eubank Betts is an acceptable provider with a clean disciplinary record and reasonable PCAOB standing, but the lower licensing sub-score suggests you should verify current credentials and any historical registration notes before engagement. Check references, confirm active licensing in your state, and ask about the specific PCAOB findings on file.