What Verdica's 649 score means for Hazel-Leilani Bradford
Hazel-Leilani Bradford's composite score of 649 out of 850 places this Nevada-based accounting provider in the "elevated risk" band (580–669). This grade signals that while the provider is not in the highest-risk category, there are compliance or credential concerns that warrant attention before engagement.
A score in this range typically reflects a mixed compliance picture: some dimensions are solid, while others lag behind regulatory or industry standards. In Bradford's case, the score is pulled down primarily by credential and licensing gaps, even as the PCAOB audit record remains strong. For a business owner or consumer considering this provider, an elevated-risk score means you should conduct additional due diligence—review references, confirm current licensing status directly with Nevada regulators, and clarify what services are in scope—before committing to a long-term relationship.
The absence of indexed customer reviews means this analysis relies solely on regulatory and public board data. That lack of third-party feedback is itself a data point: either the provider is newer, operates in a limited geographic or service area, or does not have readily discoverable client testimonials.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (320 / 850): This is the weakest component of Bradford's profile. A sub-score of 320 indicates significant gaps in formal credentials, certifications, or state licensing requirements. In the accounting field, this dimension typically tracks CPA licensure, continuing education compliance, and registration status with state boards. A score this low suggests either missing certifications, lapsed renewals, or other credential deficiencies that would normally be flagged during a state board audit. This is a red flag that deserves immediate verification.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board record is strong at 810. This score reflects the results of PCAOB inspections and quality control reviews of audit work (if applicable to Bradford's practice). A score in this range indicates that any inspections conducted did not surface major audit quality failures, internal control breakdowns, or systemic compliance violations. This is the most reassuring element of the profile.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): A perfect score here means no public disciplinary actions, sanctions, or enforcement findings from Nevada regulators or the PCAOB are recorded. This suggests a clean disciplinary history, at least in the jurisdictions and timeframes that Verdica's sources track.
What regulators in NV track for accounting providers
Nevada's state board and the PCAOB together monitor accounting providers on several fronts:
Licensing & Registration: The Nevada State Board of Accountancy maintains a registry of CPAs and public accounting firms. Providers must hold current licenses, maintain required education hours, and renew credentials on schedule. A low credential score often signals lapses in these administrative requirements.
Audit Quality & Compliance: The PCAOB conducts periodic inspections of accounting firms that audit public companies or broker-dealers. Inspections assess whether firms maintain adequate internal quality controls, comply with auditing standards, and conduct audits that meet PCAOB requirements. Findings from these inspections—categorized by severity—flow into the PCAOB Record score.
Disciplinary Actions: Both Nevada regulators and the PCAOB can issue sanctions for violations of professional standards, ethical rules, or state laws. These range from warnings and fines to license revocation. A clean disciplinary record suggests compliance with regulations, though it does not guarantee the absence of minor infractions that fall below the public-action threshold.
Bottom line
Hazel-Leilani Bradford's elevated-risk score reflects credential weaknesses that outweigh an otherwise clean disciplinary record and solid PCAOB audit history. Before engaging this provider, verify current Nevada licensing status directly, request references from recent clients, and confirm that all required certifications are active and in good standing. The mixed profile warrants caution but does not automatically disqualify the provider.