What Verdica's 792 score means for James Breckenridge
A composite score of 792 places James Breckenridge in the "excellent" band (800–850 range is the highest tier; 792 sits just below that threshold in the "strong" band of 740–799). This score reflects Verdica's assessment of compliance risk across three regulatory dimensions: professional credentials, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary record.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, a score in the strong-to-excellent range suggests low compliance risk based on available regulatory data. The provider has demonstrated consistent alignment with state licensing requirements and federal audit standards. However, the score is composite and granular—the sub-scores reveal that performance is not uniform across all dimensions, which matters for understanding where strengths and potential vulnerabilities lie.
A reader should interpret this score as: James Breckenridge meets or exceeds minimum regulatory thresholds and has not incurred major disciplinary action. The provider is suitable for standard accounting engagements where regulatory compliance is a baseline requirement. However, no composite score is a substitute for direct vetting—this analysis covers only regulatory data available to state boards and the PCAOB, not client experience, service quality, or operational reliability.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (730 / 850): This sub-score reflects state board registration, active licensing status, and educational/certification credentials (such as CPA standing). A score of 730 is in the "acceptable" range and indicates that James Breckenridge holds valid credentials and meets Colorado's registration requirements. It is not a perfect score, which may suggest either that credential documentation has minor gaps, that renewal cycles are pending, or that additional certifications beyond minimum requirements are absent. In the accounting profession, this is a routine position—most active practitioners score in this band.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): This score reflects the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's inspection and audit findings. A score of 810 is in the "excellent" range and indicates that any PCAOB inspections or audit quality reviews have not identified systemic issues with audit methodology, documentation, or compliance controls. A high PCAOB score means the provider's work has withstood federal scrutiny. This is a strong indicator for clients requiring audits of public or regulated entities.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): A perfect score in this dimension indicates no record of complaints, sanctions, suspensions, or enforcement actions tracked by Colorado's accounting board or federal regulators. This is the strongest possible position—the provider has no documented disciplinary history in the regulatory record.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board of accountancy and the PCAOB maintain overlapping but distinct oversight roles. The state board administers licensing, continuing education requirements, and complaint investigation. Violations that lower credentials scores include lapses in renewal, failure to meet continuing professional education hours, or misrepresentation of qualifications.
The PCAOB inspects audit firms (particularly those that audit public companies or file audits with the SEC) and issues findings on quality control, technical competence, and compliance with auditing standards. Common audit quality issues that lower PCAOB scores include inadequate audit procedures, insufficient documentation, or failure to identify material misstatements. The disciplinary dimension tracks formal actions: license revocation, suspension, monetary penalties, or consent agreements with regulators.
These data sources are backward-looking; they reflect compliance history, not forward-looking risk. A clean record means the provider has complied with rules to date, not that future performance is guaranteed.
Bottom line
James Breckenridge's 792 score indicates a strong compliance profile with no disciplinary history and solid audit quality. This provider is appropriate for most standard accounting engagements. Prospective clients should verify references, clarify service scope and fees, and request sample work product—the regulatory score confirms baseline compliance, not suitability for your specific needs.