What Verdica's 656 score means for Jane Eckenrode
Jane Eckenrode's composite score of 656 out of 850 places her in the "elevated risk" band (580–669). This means her profile shows mixed compliance signals: some areas of strength, but also gaps that warrant attention before engagement.
A score in this range reflects an accounting provider who meets baseline regulatory requirements in some dimensions but carries higher-than-ideal risk in others. For business owners or individuals considering Jane Eckenrode's services, this score suggests she is not automatically disqualified—she holds active credentials and maintains a public record—but due diligence beyond this score is prudent. Her PCAOB standing is notably strong, but her license and credentials sub-score is substantially lower, creating an imbalance that pushes the overall grade to B rather than higher. No independent customer reviews have been indexed yet, so public feedback cannot yet inform the picture.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (340 / ~850): This sub-score is the weakest component of Jane Eckenrode's profile. In accounting, a low credential score typically reflects gaps in current registrations, certifications, continuing education compliance, or standing with state licensing boards. A score of 340 suggests potential issues such as lapsed certifications, restricted licenses, or incomplete credential documentation on file with Colorado's regulating body. This is the single largest driver pulling down her composite score.
PCAOB Record (810 / ~850): This is her strongest dimension. The PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) conducts inspections and maintains records of audit quality and firm compliance. A score of 810 indicates that Jane Eckenrode's audit work and firm practices have not generated significant PCAOB findings or enforcement actions. This suggests competence in audit execution and quality control on the work product side.
Disciplinary (850 / ~850): A perfect score here means no disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions are recorded against Jane Eckenrode in available regulatory databases. This is a positive signal that she has not faced formal enforcement from Colorado's state board or other regulatory bodies.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state accounting board and the PCAOB together monitor several critical dimensions of provider compliance:
State Board Registration & Licensing: Colorado tracks active CPA licenses, whether providers hold required certifications (CPA, CFP, etc.), completion of mandatory continuing professional education (CPE), and adherence to ethical rules. License sub-scores are computed from registration status and any restrictions, suspensions, or compliance gaps flagged by the state. A low score in this area often signals incomplete filings, expired credentials, or unresolved compliance matters with the state board.
PCAOB Audit Inspections: For firms that audit public companies, the PCAOB conducts annual or triennial inspections, reviewing quality control, audit documentation, and partner conduct. Inspection findings—ranging from minor observations to significant deficiencies—affect this sub-score. Firms with clean or near-clean inspection records score high; those with repeated or serious findings score lower.
Disciplinary Records: Both the state board and PCAOB maintain public disciplinary records. Actions include warnings, fines, required corrective action plans, and license suspension or revocation. The absence of disciplinary action is a baseline compliance expectation.
These regulatory mechanisms exist to protect the public by ensuring accounting providers maintain technical competency, ethical standards, and quality controls.
Bottom line
Jane Eckenrode presents a mixed profile: her audit work quality and disciplinary record are solid, but her credentials or licensing standing in Colorado appears to carry unresolved issues. Before engaging her services, verify the current status of her CPA license with the Colorado Division of Professions and Occupations, confirm all active certifications, and ask directly about any credential gaps or restrictions. Her elevated-risk score warrants this extra step.