What Verdica's 820 score means for Jason Wynne
Jason Wynne's composite score of 820 out of 850 places him in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850), which reflects strong overall compliance standing across the dimensions tracked by public regulators. This score indicates that his licensing, PCAOB audit record, and disciplinary history all align with or exceed baseline expectations for accounting providers in Texas.
A score in this range suggests low regulatory risk relative to peers. For a business owner or individual considering engaging his services, an 820 score signals that Verdica's indexed data sources—state board registration and PCAOB findings—have not surfaced material compliance gaps. That said, the score is composite and reflects what regulators publicly track; it does not measure client satisfaction, service breadth, pricing competitiveness, or day-to-day operational quality. No customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so the score represents regulatory compliance only, not market-tested performance or reputation.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (810/850): This sub-score reflects the status and history of Wynne's professional licensing in Texas. A score of 810 indicates his state board registration is active and does not carry significant defects or restrictions that would be flagged by the licensing authority. In accounting, this typically means his CPA or other relevant credential is in good standing, any required continuing education has been reported, and there are no public license holds or suspensions. The gap between this score (810) and the maximum (850) suggests either a minor administrative note or a refinement factor Verdica applies, but no material licensing issue.
PCAOB Record (810/850): This reflects Wynne's history in the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board database. PCAOB audit findings track quality control deficiencies, audit failures, or control weaknesses that emerge during inspections of public accounting firms. A score of 810 indicates Verdica's review of PCAOB audit findings associated with Wynne's firm (or his individual role within a firm) has not identified critical or repeated deficiencies. Again, the difference from maximum suggests either a historical finding that has been resolved, a minor inspection note, or score calibration; no active material violation is implied.
Disciplinary (850/850): This is a perfect sub-score, indicating no active disciplinary actions, settled complaints, or sanctions indexed in Verdica's data source from the state board or PCAOB. A clean disciplinary record in accounting is baseline; a perfect score here confirms no public enforcement history.
What regulators in TX track for accounting providers
Texas state boards (typically the State Board of Public Accountancy) require CPAs and accounting providers to maintain active licenses, meet continuing professional education requirements, and comply with ethical rules. The board publishes disciplinary actions against licensees for violations such as incompetence, fraud, dishonesty, or violations of professional standards.
The PCAOB, a nonprofit established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, conducts regular and special inspections of public accounting firms. Its audit findings focus on control deficiencies that could affect the quality of financial statement audits—for example, insufficient testing, documentation failures, or failures to detect material misstatements. When PCAOB issues inspection reports, these become public record and are indexed by compliance databases like Verdica.
These two data sources measure structural compliance: licensing validity, disciplinary history, and audit quality. They do not measure client outcomes, pricing, responsiveness, or industry-specific expertise. A high score in these dimensions indicates a provider has not triggered enforcement or quality flags; it does not guarantee any particular service level.
Bottom line
Jason Wynne's 820 score reflects a strong regulatory compliance profile with no material licensing or disciplinary concerns indexed in public records. Anyone considering his services should verify the score independently, confirm his specific services align with their needs, and consider requesting references or recent client work samples to assess quality and fit beyond the compliance baseline.