What Verdica's 827 score means for Jennifer Maliar
Jennifer Maliar's composite score of 827 out of 850 places her in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850), indicating strong overall compliance and regulatory standing. This score reflects a synthesis of three regulatory dimensions: professional licensing and credentials, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) audit history, and disciplinary records. Readers should interpret this as a signal that Maliar has maintained solid regulatory compliance across these measurable areas and presents lower compliance risk compared to providers in lower score bands. However, an excellent score does not guarantee error-free work or client satisfaction—it is a backward-looking measure of regulatory compliance, not a promise of future performance or service quality. Anyone considering engaging Maliar should view this score as one data point in a larger due-diligence process.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830/850): This sub-score reflects Maliar's current professional licensing status and credential holdings as registered with the Colorado state board. A score of 830 indicates that licensing and credential requirements are substantially met, with only minor gaps or areas of administrative concern that do not materially impair her ability to practice. Scores in this range typically suggest active, current registration without significant lapses or restrictions.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The PCAOB audit findings sub-score measures the quality and compliance outcomes documented in audit inspections or reviews. A score of 810 suggests that PCAOB audit observations have not revealed systemic deficiencies in audit quality, though like most practitioners, some findings or recommendations may exist in the record. Lower scores in this dimension typically correlate with audit quality control deficiencies, workpaper issues, or procedural non-compliance documented by the PCAOB.
Disciplinary (850/850): This perfect sub-score indicates no regulatory disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions on file with the Colorado state board or relevant regulatory bodies. This is the strongest possible outcome in this dimension. Scores below perfection typically reflect actions ranging from minor public advisories to formal sanctions, license suspensions, or other enforcement activity.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
The Colorado state board and PCAOB monitor accounting providers through two primary compliance lenses:
State Board Registration tracks professional licensure (CPA status), renewal timelines, continuing education compliance, and any disciplinary complaints or enforcement actions. Registration requirements ensure baseline competence and ongoing adherence to professional standards. Violations that lower scores include failure to renew, false credential claims, or substantiated complaints leading to sanctions.
PCAOB Audit Inspections examine the quality of audit work performed on public company financial statements. The PCAOB assesses whether firms have adequate quality control policies, whether auditors documented sufficient evidence, and whether conclusions were supported by work performed. Common findings that depress PCAOB-related scores include insufficient testing, inadequate documentation, failure to evaluate audit risks, or non-compliance with auditing standards. The PCAOB publishes findings for larger firms publicly; smaller practitioners may be reviewed on a sampling basis.
Both regulators focus on protecting public investors and maintaining market confidence in financial reporting. Neither regulator scores tax preparation, bookkeeping, or non-audit services on the same basis, so Maliar's scores reflect her audit and attest work if applicable, and compliance with professional standards generally.
Bottom line
Jennifer Maliar's 827 score reflects solid regulatory standing with no disciplinary history and substantial compliance across licensing and audit quality dimensions. Before engaging her services, verify that her specific service offering (audit, tax, bookkeeping) aligns with her credentials, request references from prior clients, and confirm her current Colorado registration directly with the state board. An excellent compliance score reduces regulatory risk but does not eliminate the need for client-level due diligence.