What Verdica's 827 score means for Jessica Chandler
Jessica Chandler's composite score of 827 out of 850 places her in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This means her regulatory profile—based on licensing credentials, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary records—reflects strong compliance standing relative to other accounting providers tracked in Colorado.
A score in this range indicates that regulators have found no material red flags in her publicly available record. For a business owner or consumer evaluating an accounting provider, an 827 score suggests low compliance risk based on the data sources available. That said, Verdica's scoring reflects only regulatory filings and audit findings; it does not measure customer satisfaction, response time, or service quality. The absence of indexed customer reviews means you should supplement this regulatory green light with direct reference checks or consultations.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials: 830 This sub-score reflects Jessica Chandler's standing with Colorado's state accounting board and any relevant professional licenses (such as CPA status). A score of 830 in this dimension indicates her licensing record is current and in good standing. A lower score in this category would typically flag lapses in renewal, restrictions on practice, or ongoing board investigations. High scores here mean regulators have not identified deficiencies in her qualifications or authority to practice.
PCAOB Record: 810 The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board conducts inspections and investigations of accounting firms and their audits. A score of 810 indicates that PCAOB inspection findings—if any exist in Chandler's record—have not revealed systemic quality control failures, audit deficiencies, or engagement-level compliance problems that would warrant a significant deduction. Lower PCAOB scores typically reflect findings related to audit procedure gaps, documentation issues, or internal quality-control weaknesses. The high score here suggests routine or no material findings.
Disciplinary: 850 This is a perfect sub-score, indicating no record of formal disciplinary action from state boards, the SEC, or other enforcement bodies. Disciplinary deductions typically result from substantiated complaints, ethics violations, fraud findings, or breach of fiduciary duty. The 850 in this dimension means Chandler's disciplinary history is clean within the scope of available public records.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board of accountancy and the PCAOB monitor accounting providers using two main levers:
State Registration & Licensing. Colorado requires CPAs and accounting service providers to maintain current licenses, meet continuing education requirements, and comply with state ethics rules. The state board investigates consumer complaints and can issue citations, impose fines, or restrict practice rights if violations are substantiated.
PCAOB Audits. The PCAOB inspects registered public accounting firms that audit public companies or broker-dealers. These inspections evaluate compliance with auditing standards, quality-control procedures, and documentation practices. PCAOB findings are published and flag areas such as inadequate testing of account balances, failure to identify management override risks, or insufficient communication with audit committees. A clean PCAOB record suggests the firm has met baseline quality expectations during its most recent inspection cycle.
Scores move up when providers maintain clean disciplinary records, pass PCAOB inspections without material findings, and keep licenses active and unencumbered. Scores move down when disciplinary actions, PCAOB citations, licensing lapses, or regulatory investigations appear in public records.
Bottom line
Jessica Chandler's 827 score indicates strong regulatory compliance standing with no known disciplinary issues and solid credentials in Colorado. Before engaging her services, verify that her specific expertise matches your accounting needs and request references—regulatory data confirms she has not been publicly sanctioned, but it does not measure customer experience or technical aptitude for your particular work.