What Verdica's 820 score means for Joan Anderson
Joan Anderson's composite score of 820 out of 850 places her in the "excellent" band (800–850), the highest category in Verdica's scoring framework. This score reflects strong compliance standing across the dimensions regulators track: professional licensing, audit quality, and disciplinary history.
For a reader considering whether to work with this accounting provider, an 820 score signals low regulatory risk. The entity is not flagged for material compliance concerns in the indexed data sources—PCAOB audit findings and state board registration records. However, it's important to note that Verdica's score is built on regulatory data only; no independent customer reviews are currently indexed for Joan Anderson. A strong compliance score does not speak to service quality, responsiveness, or fit for a specific business need. It does mean the provider operates within established professional standards and has not generated documented compliance issues visible to regulators.
The 30-point gap between this score and a perfect 850 suggests minor variations across the sub-score categories, which is typical even for providers with excellent standing.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (810/850): This sub-score reflects Joan Anderson's state-level professional licensing and credential verification. In Colorado, accounting providers—whether CPAs, bookkeepers, or accounting firms—must maintain active registrations with the state board. A score of 810 indicates current, valid licensure with minimal or no findings. The full 40-point gap from perfect suggests either a minor lapse, a notation in the registration record, or a credential that does not meet the highest tier. In the accounting industry, this dimension is foundational; a low score here would raise immediate flags, while a score in the 800s reflects compliant standing.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains audit inspection records for firms and practitioners who audit public companies or broker-dealers. Joan Anderson's PCAOB score of 810 reflects her firm's or individual audit quality performance based on PCAOB inspection findings. This could include observations about audit documentation, internal controls, or quality review processes. A score of 810 in this dimension means no material audit deficiencies on record, though the 40-point gap from perfect may reflect minor findings that did not rise to enforcement action. If Joan Anderson does not audit public companies, this sub-score may reflect historical or immaterial items; if she does, it speaks to audit execution standards.
Disciplinary (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no disciplinary actions, complaints substantiated by state boards, or enforcement proceedings indexed in Verdica's data. In the accounting profession, a disciplinary record can include license suspension, fines, or settlements with regulators. A score of 850 means Joan Anderson has no such history in the available regulatory record.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board of accountancy and the PCAOB together create the compliance landscape for accounting providers. The state board registers CPAs and accounting firms, enforces the Colorado accountancy act, and investigates complaints about professional conduct. Low scores in the License & Credentials dimension typically reflect renewal lapses, unlicensed practice, or substantiated violations of conduct rules.
The PCAOB, a federal regulator, inspects audit firms and their compliance with auditing standards and quality control requirements. Inspection findings can flag documentation deficiencies, insufficient evidence gathering, or internal control weaknesses. These don't automatically result in sanctions but become part of the public record that Verdica indexes.
Both regulators publish findings and disciplinary actions openly. Verdica's scoring weights these data sources to create a single compliance risk indicator.
Bottom line
Joan Anderson scores in the excellent range with no disciplinary history, indicating solid regulatory standing. Before engaging, verify that her service offerings match your needs and request references beyond regulatory data, since compliance scores do not measure customer service or expertise in your specific industry.