What Verdica's 656 score means for Jodi Neuharth
Jodi Neuharth's composite score of 656 places them in the elevated risk band (580–669). This means the provider shows mixed compliance signals: some areas meet or exceed regulatory expectations, while others warrant closer attention before engagement.
A score in this band reflects an accounting provider who is licensed and operating within the system, but carries enough regulatory or credential gaps that a prudent business owner should conduct additional due diligence. This is neither a red flag that demands immediate rejection nor a green light that permits uncritical trust. It is a signal to ask targeted questions and verify specific capabilities before signing a service agreement.
The score is calculated from three dimensions: credentials, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary record. Neuharth's performance varies significantly across these areas, which is the primary reason for the mid-range rating.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (340 / 1000): This low score indicates gaps in formal qualifications, certifications, or state licensing standing. In accounting, this typically means missing or lapsed CPA credentials, incomplete continuing education documentation, or gaps in required registrations with state boards. A score this low suggests the provider may lack credentials that clients expect or that regulations mandate for certain service types. Before hiring, verify whether Neuharth holds an active CPA license, what specific services are actually authorized under current credentials, and whether any credential gaps will limit the scope of work they can perform.
PCAOB Record (810 / 1000): This is a strong sub-score. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inspects and tracks audit quality for firms that audit public companies. A score of 810 indicates that historical PCAOB findings have been either limited in scope, resolved promptly, or did not reveal systemic quality failures. This is a positive signal about audit execution and compliance with federal auditing standards for any clients in Neuharth's purview.
Disciplinary (850 / 1000): This excellent score means there are no recorded disciplinary actions, sanctions, or complaints in the state board system that Verdica indexes. This is a strong indicator of clean regulatory standing and suggests the provider has not been the subject of formal enforcement proceedings.
The tension in this profile is clear: strong regulatory history and a clean disciplinary record are offset by credential deficiencies.
What regulators in MN track for accounting providers
Minnesota's state accounting board and the PCAOB use different but overlapping frameworks to track provider compliance.
State boards register CPAs and monitor adherence to licensing rules, continuing education requirements, and ethical conduct standards. They track credential status, scope of practice limitations, and any disciplinary action (complaints, investigations, settlements, or license suspension/revocation). A low License & Credentials score often reflects incomplete documentation or registration gaps in these state systems.
The PCAOB focuses on audit quality for firms and practitioners auditing public companies. They conduct triennial and special inspections, issue inspection reports, and track whether firms have addressed findings from prior inspections. PCAOB records include observed deficiencies in audit procedures, documentation, engagement quality reviews, and compliance with auditing standards. A high PCAOB score typically means inspection findings have been limited or well-managed.
Together, these data sources create a compliance picture: state boards ensure baseline licensing and ethics, while PCAOB data reflects audit execution quality.
Bottom line
Jodi Neuharth is a watchlist provider—not a hard reject, but not a default choice either. Before engaging, confirm the scope of services Neuharth is actually authorized to provide under current credentials, and cross-check whether those services align with your needs. The strong PCAOB and disciplinary records are reassuring, but the credential gaps must be resolved.