What Verdica's 820 score means for Josh Hansen
Josh Hansen's composite score of 820 out of 850 places him in Verdica's excellent band (800–850), indicating strong overall compliance standing across the measured dimensions. This score reflects performance data pulled from PCAOB audit findings and state board registration records—the primary regulatory touchstones for accounting providers in Colorado.
A score in the excellent range suggests that Hansen meets or exceeds baseline expectations across licensing, audit quality, and disciplinary history. For a business owner or consumer evaluating an accounting provider, a score of 820 indicates low regulatory risk based on available public records. That said, Verdica notes no independent customer reviews are indexed for this entity yet, meaning the score reflects only regulator-facing compliance, not client-reported service quality, responsiveness, or value.
The gap between Hansen's composite score (820) and the theoretical maximum (850) is modest—30 points—distributed across license credentials and PCAOB record performance, while his disciplinary sub-score is perfect at 850. This pattern suggests his compliance profile is solidly maintained, with room for improvement only in the technical audit or credentialing dimensions.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials: 810
This sub-score reflects Hansen's standing with Colorado's state board registration and any active licenses required to practice. A score of 810 in this dimension indicates current, valid registration without apparent lapse or restriction. In the accounting industry, state licensing boards track whether practitioners maintain required certifications (such as CPA status), whether licenses are in good standing, and whether any conditions or limitations apply to practice. A score below the maximum (850) might indicate minor administrative items, recent renewal cycles, or other non-disciplinary credential factors that registrars track but that don't constitute violations.
PCAOB Record: 810
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains quality control findings on audit firms and their personnel. This sub-score of 810 reflects Hansen's audit quality history—whether past audits met PCAOB standards, whether quality control reviews flagged deficiencies, and whether any observations were noted in PCAOB inspection reports. A score in the high range indicates that audits have generally conformed to professional standards. A lower score in this dimension typically signals quality control findings, repeated audit deficiencies, or observations from PCAOB inspections that suggest gaps in audit execution or documentation.
Disciplinary: 850
Hansen's perfect score on this dimension indicates no public disciplinary actions, complaints upheld by regulators, sanctions, or enforcement history in available records. Disciplinary records are binary in nature—either a regulator has taken action or not—so a maximum score here reflects a clean enforcement history. This is the most straightforward sub-score to interpret: it means no state board or federal regulator (within PCAOB's scope) has formally disciplined Hansen based on public records.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB monitor accounting providers through specific compliance mechanisms. State registration requires practitioners to maintain required credentials and report any changes in status. PCAOB inspections focus on audit quality: inspectors review whether firms maintained audit documentation, followed auditing standards, assessed risk appropriately, and gathered sufficient evidence. PCAOB findings typically address areas like insufficient testing of material accounts, inadequate evaluation of internal controls, or documentation gaps.
Scores move based on the frequency and severity of findings, the timeliness of remediation, and whether issues recur across audit cycles. A provider with no findings scores higher; one with repeated observations in the same audit area scores lower. These mechanisms exist to protect public investors and creditors by ensuring audit quality meets professional standards.
Bottom line
Josh Hansen's 820 score indicates a compliant, low-risk provider based on regulator data. Anyone considering engagement should verify the score aligns with their specific needs and request client references, since regulatory compliance and client satisfaction are separate measures.