What Verdica's 820 score means for Justin Deese
An 820 composite score places Justin Deese in Verdica's excellent band (800–850), meaning the available regulatory data reflects strong compliance standing. This score aggregates three dimensions of public accountability: professional licensing, audit quality records, and disciplinary history. A reader considering engagement with this provider can interpret an 820 score as indicating low regulatory risk based on the data sources tracked—primarily PCAOB audit findings and Colorado state board registration.
The score does not represent a guarantee of service quality or client satisfaction; notably, no independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so the assessment reflects regulatory compliance only. For someone evaluating Justin Deese as an accounting provider, the 820 signals that regulators have not flagged material deficiencies in licensing status, audit execution, or conduct violations. This positions the provider in the upper tier of the compliance spectrum.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (810): This sub-score reflects the status of Justin Deese's professional registration and credentials with Colorado's state accounting board. A score of 810 indicates that licensing records show no active suspensions, lapses, or material restrictions on the right to practice. In the accounting industry, state licensing is foundational—it verifies that a provider has met education, examination, and experience requirements. A high score here means the baseline regulatory gate has been satisfied and maintained.
PCAOB Record (810): This sub-score draws from the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's inspection and audit quality data. The PCAOB reviews audit firm quality control, documentation, and compliance with auditing standards. A score of 810 suggests that any PCAOB inspection findings or audit quality metrics do not indicate systemic deficiencies. Note that PCAOB records are primarily relevant if the provider conducts audits of public company clients; the presence of findings does not necessarily mean violations, but rather areas where regulators observed control gaps or procedural gaps.
Disciplinary (850): This is the highest sub-score in the profile, indicating no current public disciplinary actions, complaints substantiated by the state board, or enforcement proceedings. In accounting regulation, disciplinary records track conduct violations, ethics breaches, fraud allegations, and regulatory censures. An 850 reflects a clean disciplinary record within the scope of available state and federal data.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board of accountancy and the PCAOB maintain separate but complementary oversight systems. The state board enforces professional licensing, education credits, and ethical conduct rules; it investigates complaints and can issue discipline ranging from warnings to license revocation. Verdica's score incorporates whether an entity has active complaints, substantiated violations, or restrictions on practice.
The PCAOB conducts triennial inspections of audit firms and reviews individual audit engagements for compliance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) and internal quality controls. PCAOB findings can flag issues such as insufficient evidence gathering, inadequate testing of material accounts, or deficient documentation. These findings influence public perception and regulatory standing but do not automatically result in enforcement action. Firms with frequent or severe findings typically see downward score pressure.
Together, these data sources create a compliance profile. Regulators look for patterns: repeated audit quality issues, unresolved complaints, or licensing lapses. Verdica's scoring weights these factors to produce a transparent, data-driven risk assessment.
Bottom line
Justin Deese's 820 score reflects strong regulatory standing with no apparent licensing restrictions or disciplinary history, and acceptable PCAOB audit quality metrics. This is a solid compliance profile suitable for most business relationships. However, prospective clients should independently verify references, service scope, and fee terms—regulatory compliance is necessary but not sufficient for evaluating overall fit.