What Verdica's 656 score means for K. Rorie
K. Rorie's composite score of 656 out of 850 places this Missouri accounting provider in the elevated risk band (580–669). This grade B score indicates that while the entity meets baseline regulatory requirements, there are meaningful gaps or concerns that warrant closer attention before engagement.
A score in this range reflects mixed performance across compliance dimensions. The provider is not in the high-risk category, which would suggest systemic problems or serious regulatory action. However, the score is also not in the acceptable or strong bands, where confidence in compliance and quality controls would be higher. For a business owner or individual seeking accounting services, a 656 score means due diligence is warranted—this is not a straightforward yes or no, but rather a conditional relationship that requires verification of specific qualifications and track record for your use case.
The absence of independent customer reviews indexed in Verdica's database means you cannot cross-reference this regulatory data against real-world client experience. This absence itself is neutral data; it simply means the compliance picture is drawn entirely from regulator records rather than triangulated with user feedback.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials: 340 out of 850
This is the lowest sub-score and the primary drag on K. Rorie's composite rating. A score of 340 in this dimension is well below the elevated threshold and suggests material deficiencies in licensure status, credential completeness, or registration standing with Missouri's state board. In the accounting field, this dimension typically reflects whether the provider holds required CPA licenses, maintains current registrations, has completed mandatory continuing education, or faces any lapsed or restricted credentials. A low score here does not automatically mean the provider cannot legally operate, but it does signal incomplete or problematic standing that a potential client should investigate directly.
PCAOB Record: 810 out of 850
This sub-score is strong and reflects K. Rorie's performance history under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board audits and inspections. A score of 810 indicates that PCAOB audit findings have been largely favorable or that any deficiencies noted were minor and remediated. This is a positive signal within the compliance framework and suggests the provider has demonstrated competence in executing audit work to federal standards.
Disciplinary: 850 out of 850
This perfect sub-score means K. Rorie has no disciplinary actions, complaints substantiated by state regulators, or sanctions in the available record. This is the strongest possible outcome in this dimension and indicates a clean disciplinary history with Missouri's state board.
What regulators in MO track for accounting providers
Missouri's state board of accountancy and the PCAOB together monitor accounting providers along three core compliance pathways. State board registration tracks whether a firm and its individual practitioners hold active CPAs licenses, meet continuing education requirements, and maintain proper business registrations. Failures here—such as expired licenses, incomplete education hours, or lapsed firm registrations—lower the credentials score.
PCAOB audit inspections examine the quality of audit work itself: whether the firm followed auditing standards, maintained adequate documentation, identified material misstatements, and applied appropriate skepticism. Inspection findings that reveal systemic quality issues or repeated failures lower the PCAOB score.
Disciplinary records include formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions imposed by the state board for violations of accounting rules, ethics standards, or law. A clean disciplinary record is the baseline expectation; any substantiated action raises risk.
These three data streams give regulators—and Verdica's scoring model—a multidimensional view of compliance and capability.
Bottom line
K. Rorie is not a high-risk provider, but the elevated composite score and notably weak credentials sub-score warrant direct verification before engagement. Before proceeding, confirm current license status, any restrictions on the Missouri board's website, and the nature of the credential gaps reflected in the low sub-score.