What Verdica's 656 score means for Kenneth Andrews
Kenneth Andrews holds a composite Verdica score of 656 out of 850, placing him in the "elevated risk" band (580–669). This score reflects a mixed compliance profile: while his PCAOB audit record is strong, his licensing and credentials present material gaps that pull the overall rating down.
A score in the elevated range signals that this provider has demonstrated competence in some regulatory areas but carries identifiable concerns that warrant scrutiny before engagement. For a business owner or financial decision-maker, this means Kenneth Andrews is not disqualified on the basis of his score alone, but he is not a low-friction choice either. You would be reasonable to ask clarifying questions, verify current licensing status directly with the Washington state board, and understand what credential gaps underlie the lower sub-score in that dimension. The absence of independent customer reviews in Verdica's indexed database also means you lack third-party operational context—a factor worth compensating for through direct reference checks.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials: 340 / 850
This is the primary drag on Kenneth Andrews's composite score. A sub-score of 340 indicates significant gaps or deficiencies in professional licensing, certifications, or credential documentation tracked by the state of Washington. In accounting, this dimension typically measures current CPA licensure status, required continuing education compliance, and relevant professional designations. A low score here does not necessarily mean fraud or gross misconduct; it often reflects lapsed renewals, incomplete filings, or credential mismatches against state requirements. However, it is a red flag that demands clarification. Before contracting with this provider, you should independently confirm his current licensure status with the Washington State Board of Accountancy.
PCAOB Record: 810 / 850
The PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) sub-score of 810 is notably strong. The PCAOB oversees audits of public company financial statements and conducts inspections of registered accounting firms. A score of 810 reflects a clean or near-clean inspection history and suggests that any audit quality issues identified have been minor or adequately remediated. This dimension is the bright spot in Kenneth Andrews's profile and indicates that his technical audit work has met federal standards.
Disciplinary: 850 / 850
A perfect disciplinary score means no substantiated complaints, sanctions, or enforcement actions are recorded in the state board database or PCAOB records. This is a positive signal and indicates no history of ethics violations, fraud findings, or regulatory discipline.
What regulators in WA track for accounting providers
Washington State Board of Accountancy and the PCAOB maintain separate but complementary oversight:
The state board registers CPAs and monitors licensing compliance. They track continuing education hours, fee payments, and professional conduct complaints. Violations can include practicing without a current license, false credential claims, or ethical breaches. Scores in this dimension reflect the applicant's compliance with these state-level gate-keeping requirements.
The PCAOB conducts triennial or periodic inspections of accounting firms and individual auditors who conduct public company audits. Inspections assess audit quality, documentation, professional skepticism, and adherence to auditing standards. Findings can range from minor documentation gaps to material failures in audit procedures. Firms or individuals with clean inspection records receive high scores.
Disciplinary records come from state board complaint investigations and PCAOB enforcement actions, which may result in warnings, sanctions, or license revocation.
Bottom line
Kenneth Andrews presents a mixed profile: strong PCAOB audit quality and clean disciplinary history, but material credential or licensing concerns that require direct verification. Before engaging his services, confirm his current Washington CPA license status directly with the state board and ask for clarification on what credentials or licensing items underlie the lower sub-score. His elevated-risk rating is not a disqualification, but it is a signal to verify independently rather than assume baseline compliance.