What Verdica's 656 score means for Kenneth Burch
Kenneth Burch's composite score of 656 out of 850 places him in the "elevated risk" band (580–669). This means his profile shows mixed signals: some areas of compliance strength, but meaningful gaps that warrant attention before engagement.
A score in this range suggests the provider meets baseline regulatory requirements in certain dimensions but carries enough uncertainty or weakness in others to justify additional due diligence. For a business owner or audit committee considering Kenneth Burch's services, the 656 score is neither a red flag that demands immediate rejection nor a green light for confidence. It signals "proceed with eyes open"—verify credentials independently, ask specific questions about his audit practices, and confirm he meets your organization's risk tolerance.
The three sub-scores tell the story: his PCAOB record is strong (810), his disciplinary history is clean (850), but his licensing and credentials fall short (340). This pattern suggests he may be compliant with ongoing regulatory oversight but lacks certain professional certifications or registration status that the accounting industry typically expects.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (340): This is the weakest component and represents a significant concern. In accounting, this sub-score typically reflects state board registration status, CPA licensing, firm registration with the PCAOB, and relevant professional certifications. A score of 340 in this category indicates gaps—whether missing licenses, expired credentials, limited registrations, or incomplete certifications. The accounting industry relies on these credentials as a primary trust signal; their absence or incompleteness raises questions about whether Burch has the formal qualifications expected for certain audit or accounting roles.
PCAOB Record (810): This is Kenneth Burch's strongest metric. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains detailed inspection records of audit firms and their personnel. A score of 810 indicates his PCAOB audit findings have been relatively favorable—his recent inspections likely showed few or minor deficiencies in audit quality, documentation, or methodology. This suggests his actual audit work has held up to regulatory scrutiny.
Disciplinary (850): A perfect score here means no substantive disciplinary actions are on record with the PCAOB, SEC, state boards, or other oversight bodies. This is a clean slate—no enforcement actions, sanctions, suspensions, or censures documented in public regulatory files.
Together, these scores create a tension: his audit quality and disciplinary record are strong, but his credentials don't fully align with what regulators and industry standards expect.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state accounting board and the PCAOB together oversee the licensing, conduct, and audit quality of accounting providers. The PCAOB conducts triennial inspections of audit firms, examining engagement files, working papers, and quality controls. Inspectors look for violations of auditing standards, failure to identify material errors, weak internal controls, and inadequate documentation. Findings are published in summary form and inform Verdica's PCAOB sub-score.
State board registration ensures providers meet education requirements, pass the CPA exam (where applicable), maintain continuing professional education, and comply with ethical rules. Missing or lapsed registrations appear in state licensing databases and directly lower the Credentials sub-score.
Disciplinary records track formal actions: violations of professional standards, failure to comply with board orders, fee disputes, or criminal convictions. The absence of such records boosts the Disciplinary score.
These three dimensions—inspection quality, registration completeness, and disciplinary history—create a multi-lens view of compliance posture. A provider strong on two but weak on one should be questioned about the gap.
Bottom line
Kenneth Burch's 656 score reflects a provider with clean compliance history and respectable audit work, but with unresolved credentialing gaps. Before engaging him, verify his current Colorado registration status, clarify which licenses or certifications are missing, and confirm whether those gaps affect the scope of work you need. Request his most recent PCAOB inspection summary to validate the strong audit-quality score.