What Verdica's 827 score means for Kevin Lucas
Kevin Lucas in Arizona holds a composite compliance score of 827 out of 850, placing him in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects regulatory standing across three dimensions tracked by public databases: professional credentials, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) audit history, and disciplinary records.
A score in the excellent range indicates that Kevin Lucas has maintained current licensing, a clean or minimal disciplinary history, and no significant findings in PCAOB audit reviews. Readers should interpret this as a signal that the provider meets or exceeds baseline regulatory expectations set by state and federal accounting boards.
It's important to note that an 827 score measures regulatory compliance, not service quality, pricing, or client satisfaction. The data sources—PCAOB findings and state board registration—are backward-looking and threshold-based. A high score means Kevin Lucas has not triggered red flags in these systems; it does not measure customer experience or technical expertise. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so readers cannot yet cross-reference regulatory standing with real-world client feedback.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830 / 850): This sub-score reflects whether Kevin Lucas holds current, valid professional licenses required by Arizona and whether any lapses, restrictions, or credential challenges exist in state board records. A score of 830 is near the top of the band, suggesting active registration and compliance with continuing education or renewal requirements. A declining trend in this metric would typically signal license suspension, lapse, or board investigation into fitness to practice.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): The PCAOB, a congressionally mandated nonprofit, inspects public accounting firms and reviews their audit work for compliance with standards. This sub-score aggregates findings from inspections and investigations. A score of 810 indicates that Kevin Lucas or his firm has not been cited for significant deficiencies in audit quality, reporting, or internal controls—or if minor issues were flagged, they were resolved. Scores drop sharply when inspections uncover repeated audit failures, documentation gaps, or violations of independence rules.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): This is a perfect sub-score, indicating no formal sanctions, censures, fines, or disbarment actions recorded in state or federal disciplinary databases. A score below 850 would reflect past misconduct findings—ranging from minor (billing disputes, late filing) to serious (fraud, gross negligence, or violations of auditor independence).
What regulators in AZ track for accounting providers
Arizona's accounting board and the PCAOB jointly establish the compliance landscape for public accounting providers. State boards verify that practitioners hold CPAs or equivalent credentials, renew licenses on schedule, and complete required professional development hours. They also investigate complaints from clients or other parties alleging unethical conduct, fraud, or incompetence.
The PCAOB, established after the Enron scandal, oversees firms that audit public companies. Its inspections examine whether auditors collected sufficient evidence, tested internal controls properly, and maintained independence from clients. Common findings that lower PCAOB scores include inadequate testing of high-risk accounts, failure to challenge management assertions, and insufficient documentation of audit procedures. Inspectors also flag failures to comply with auditor independence rules—for instance, if an auditor had undisclosed financial relationships with a client.
Disciplinary records capture formal outcomes: state boards may suspend or revoke licenses, impose fines, or require remedial training. The PCAOB may bar individuals from audit work, fine firms, or require independent monitoring.
Scores move up when practitioners renew licenses on time, pass inspections without finding, and maintain clean complaint histories. Scores move down when inspections reveal systematic deficiencies, state boards substantiate misconduct complaints, or independence violations surface.
Bottom line
Kevin Lucas scores in the excellent regulatory band and carries no apparent disciplinary history, making him a lower-risk choice from a compliance standpoint. However, prospective clients should still verify references, understand fee structures, and confirm whether his firm's experience matches their specific audit or accounting needs—none of which Verdica's regulatory score measures.