What Verdica's 827 score means for Kristine Tidd
Kristine Tidd's composite score of 827 out of 850 places her in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850), indicating strong regulatory standing and compliance performance. This score reflects data from PCAOB audit findings and Colorado state board registration—the primary regulatory touchstones for accounting providers.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating an accounting provider, a score in this range signals low regulatory risk based on available public records. The score does not mean the provider is perfect, nor does it account for factors like service quality, pricing, or customer experience (which would require independent reviews). Rather, it tells you that according to PCAOB and state licensing records, Kristine Tidd has demonstrated compliance with professional standards and licensing requirements that regulators monitor.
A 827 score is 27 points above the floor of the excellent band, suggesting solid footing rather than a marginal position. The gap between this score and the maximum (850) indicates room exists in the regulatory record—typical for most providers—but the distance is modest. Readers should understand this as "very low compliance risk based on public regulatory data" rather than a claim of zero issues or universal excellence.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830): This sub-score evaluates whether Kristine Tidd holds valid, current licensure and meets professional credential requirements set by Colorado. A score of 830 indicates the provider's licensing status is in good standing. In the accounting industry, this dimension flags lapses, suspensions, or failure to maintain required certifications (CPA, etc.). No red flags appear in this category.
PCAOB Record (810): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board audits and inspects firms that audit public companies. This score reflects findings from PCAOB inspection reports—quality control audits that assess compliance with auditing standards. A score of 810 suggests Kristine Tidd's PCAOB record does not contain significant deficiencies or enforcement actions. Lower scores in this category would indicate inspection findings related to audit quality, documentation, or procedural lapses.
Disciplinary (850): This perfect sub-score reflects the absence of disciplinary actions from Colorado's board or any linked enforcement history in the dataset. In accounting regulation, disciplinary records capture complaints, investigations, and sanctions. A 850 means no such actions are indexed—the strongest possible position in this dimension.
The three sub-scores are relatively tightly clustered (830, 810, 850), with disciplinary strength outpacing the other two. This pattern is common: the absence of discipline is binary (you either have it or you don't), while licensing and PCAOB audit findings exist on spectrums and incorporate more granular compliance measures.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board manages CPA licensure, renewal compliance, and continuing education requirements. PCAOB, a federally chartered nonprofit, conducts inspections of firms auditing public companies and issues reports that become public record. Both regulators track adherence to professional standards, ethical rules, and technical competence.
Scores move based on factors such as:
- Licensing: Active status, timely renewal, no suspensions or revocations.
- PCAOB audits: Deficiency findings related to audit documentation, evidence gathering, or quality control; enforcement actions or sanctions.
- Disciplinary history: Complaints resolved against the provider, board investigations, or consent orders.
These are objective, public measures. They do not assess customer service, pricing competitiveness, or niche expertise.
Bottom line
Kristine Tidd's 827 score indicates excellent compliance standing based on public regulatory records in Colorado and PCAOB audit history. If you are evaluating her as an accounting provider, this score suggests low regulatory risk; cross-check her service scope and pricing against your needs, and consider requesting references or reviewing any available client feedback to assess fit beyond compliance metrics.