What Verdica's 820 score means for Kyle Rabbitt
Kyle Rabbitt's composite score of 820 out of 850 places them in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850), reflecting strong alignment with regulatory standards across the dimensions Verdica measures. This score sits near the top of the scale and suggests that, based on available PCAOB audit findings and Colorado state board registration data, this accounting provider has demonstrated consistent compliance with professional licensing and quality expectations.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating an accounting provider, a score in this range typically signals low regulatory risk. However, it's important to understand what this score does and does not measure. Verdica's composite reflects historical compliance posture as captured in regulator databases—it does not predict service quality, pricing, responsiveness, or fit for your specific needs. The score is one data point in due diligence, not a complete picture.
The 820 score also means there is currently no indexed customer review data on file. This is neither a positive nor negative indicator; it simply means Verdica's database has not yet collected public feedback or complaints from prior clients. You may want to seek independent references or reviews through other channels before making a final decision.
How the sub-scores break down
Kyle Rabbitt's profile shows three sub-score dimensions:
License & Credentials (810): This sub-score reflects the status of professional licensing and credential standing with Colorado's state board. A score of 810 indicates the provider maintains active, valid licensing without significant unresolved compliance gaps in registration records. In the accounting field, this typically means the provider holds the necessary CPA or accounting licenses required by state law and has not triggered major red flags during periodic registration reviews.
PCAOB Record (810): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains inspection and audit records for firms that audit public companies or broker-dealers. A PCAOB Record score of 810 suggests that any PCAOB audit findings on file do not contain serious deficiencies or repeated quality control violations. This sub-score is most relevant if Kyle Rabbitt's firm performs audits of public entities; if they focus on private clients or tax/bookkeeping services, this measure has less bearing on day-to-day practice quality.
Disciplinary (850): This is the highest sub-score and indicates no material disciplinary actions or settled complaints in the state board's enforcement database. In accounting regulation, disciplinary records typically track violations such as failure to maintain competency, client trust account mismanagement, tax preparation errors leading to client harm, or ethical violations. A score of 850 here reflects a clean disciplinary history.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB maintain separate but complementary oversight regimes. The state board registration system verifies that providers hold valid licenses, meet continuing education requirements, and comply with basic professional standards. It also records any disciplinary actions, which range from warning letters to license suspension or revocation.
The PCAOB, a federal regulator, conducts periodic inspections and audits of firms that audit public companies. PCAOB findings can identify deficiencies in audit methodology, insufficient documentation, inadequate quality controls, and non-compliance with auditing standards. These findings become part of the firm's public record and factor into Verdica's PCAOB Record sub-score.
Scores move based on the severity and recency of findings, the number of unresolved compliance matters, and whether corrective actions have been documented. A provider with no disciplinary history and clean PCAOB inspections scores highest; conversely, repeated violations, ongoing investigations, or serious audit quality issues drive scores downward.
Bottom line
Kyle Rabbitt's score of 820 indicates a provider with strong regulatory standing and no apparent disciplinary issues. This makes them a lower-risk choice from a compliance perspective. Before engaging, verify that their service offerings match your needs, seek independent client references, and confirm they carry appropriate malpractice insurance—the Verdica score alone does not guarantee service fit or performance.