What Verdica's 656 score means for Lawrence Miller
Lawrence Miller's composite score of 656 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the elevated risk band (580–669). This means the entity meets baseline regulatory requirements but carries meaningful compliance concerns that warrant attention from potential clients or referral sources.
A score in this range reflects an accounting provider that is registered and actively audited by regulators, but has not achieved the consistency or track record of higher-scoring peers. For a business owner evaluating whether to engage Lawrence Miller's services, a 656 score signals that due diligence is warranted—this is not a high-risk entity that should be avoided outright, but neither is it one that passes compliance checks with flying colors. Think of it as a yellow flag rather than a red one.
The score is pulled from two main regulatory sources: Washington state board registration data and PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) audit records. The fact that Lawrence Miller maintains both active licensing and a PCAOB audit history indicates participation in the oversight system. However, the gap between the sub-score components (detailed below) reveals where the compliance picture becomes more nuanced.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (340 / 850): This is the weakest component of Lawrence Miller's profile. A sub-score of 340 reflects issues related to professional licensing, credential verification, or state board registration status in Washington. In the accounting industry, this dimension captures whether a provider holds active CPAs, whether licenses are in good standing, and whether there are any lapsed or restricted credentials. A score this low does not necessarily mean the provider is unlicensed, but it suggests credential gaps, restrictions, or registration deficiencies that regulators have flagged. This is the primary driver pulling the overall composite score into the elevated-risk band.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): This sub-score is substantially stronger, indicating a relatively clean history on PCAOB audit inspections. The PCAOB oversees auditors of public companies and evaluates the quality of their audit work, compliance with standards, and adherence to independence rules. A score of 810 suggests Lawrence Miller has passed PCAOB inspections without major findings in recent cycles, or that any findings identified have been limited in scope or severity. This is a bright spot in the profile and offsets some concern from the credential score.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): This is a perfect sub-score, meaning no disciplinary history has been recorded in Verdica's indexed data sources. In plain terms, Lawrence Miller has no sanctions, fines, suspensions, or formal complaints in the regulatory record that Verdica tracks. For an accounting provider, this is the baseline expectation, and Lawrence Miller meets it.
What regulators in WA track for accounting providers
Washington's state accounting board and the PCAOB jointly oversee public accounting firms. State boards enforce professional licensing standards, continuing education requirements, and ethical rules for CPAs. The PCAOB inspects audit work quality, testing whether firms followed auditing standards, documented evidence properly, and maintained client independence—critical issues for firms serving public companies.
Verdica's composite score pulls data on licensing status, credential verification, PCAOB inspection findings (such as deficiencies in audit documentation, quality control, or auditor independence), and any disciplinary actions (fines, suspensions, consent orders). A low licensing score typically signals unresolved credential issues, whereas a low PCAOB score reflects audit quality concerns. The disciplinary sub-score captures formal enforcement action.
Bottom line
Lawrence Miller operates with a clean disciplinary record and acceptable PCAOB audit history, but credential and licensing issues in Washington pull the overall profile into the elevated-risk category. Before engaging this provider, verify the specific nature of the licensing concerns with the Washington state board directly, and confirm current credential status with any public companies or high-stakes audit engagements that require full compliance clarity.