What Verdica's 820 score means for Lindsey Levine
Lindsey Levine's composite score of 820 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects strong overall compliance across the dimensions Verdica tracks: state licensing, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary record.
A score in this range indicates that regulators have found no material deficiencies in this provider's credentials, audit quality, or conduct history. For a business owner or organization evaluating whether to engage this provider, an 820 suggests low compliance risk based on available regulatory data. The three-point gap from a perfect 850 is minimal and typical; perfect scores are rare in any regulated profession.
It's important to note that this score is built on two specific data sources: PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) audit findings and Colorado state board registration records. The absence of indexed customer reviews means Verdica has not yet aggregated third-party feedback on this entity, so this analysis reflects regulatory standing only, not client experience or service delivery factors.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (810 / 850): This sub-score reflects whether Lindsey Levine holds required state and federal registration to practice as an accounting professional in Colorado. A score of 810 indicates current, active licensing with no significant compliance gaps in credential maintenance. In the accounting industry, licensing sub-scores typically decline when registrations lapse, renewal requirements are missed, or the state board flags deficiencies in continuing education or firm infrastructure. The 40-point gap from perfect reflects minor variances—common in the regulatory process—rather than substantive problems.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): The PCAOB monitors audit quality and firm compliance for entities that audit public companies or broker-dealers. This sub-score of 810 means Lindsey Levine's audit work, as reviewed by PCAOB inspections, has not revealed significant deficiencies in audit methodology, documentation, or independence. PCAOB records improve when audit quality is consistent and deteriorate when inspectors document failures to detect misstatements, inadequate testing, or violations of auditing standards. A score of 810 indicates audit work that meets regulatory expectations.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): A perfect score here means no disciplinary actions are recorded in Colorado state board files or PCAOB enforcement history. This is the strongest possible signal in this dimension. Disciplinary records typically document violations of professional conduct rules, fee disputes found in the provider's favor, or sanctions from regulatory bodies. A perfect score means none of these adverse actions appear in the underlying data.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board of accountancy registers CPAs and regulates their practice. The board enforces continuing education requirements, monitors fee disputes and complaints, and investigates allegations of incompetence or unethical conduct. Violations can result in sanctions, license suspension, or revocation.
The PCAOB, established under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, inspects accounting firms that audit public companies. During inspections, PCAOB staff evaluate audit files to assess whether firms followed auditing standards, properly planned and executed audits, and maintained independence. PCAOB findings become part of a firm's regulatory record and can affect reputation and regulatory standing. Significant audit quality deficiencies can trigger enforcement investigations.
Verdica's scoring draws on both sources because they reflect different compliance domains: state-level licensing and ethics versus federal audit quality oversight. Together, they provide a broad view of regulatory compliance.
Bottom line
Lindsey Levine's 820 score indicates strong regulatory compliance with no red flags in licensing, audit quality, or disciplinary history. This provider represents low compliance risk based on available regulatory data. Anyone considering engagement should still verify current credentials independently and ask for client references, since this score does not capture service quality, communication, or fit for your specific accounting needs.