What Verdica's 827 score means for Marilee Plunkett
Marilee Plunkett's composite score of 827 out of 850 places her in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850 range). This score reflects a compliance profile built on three regulatory dimensions: professional licensing and credentials, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary records. A score in this range indicates that an accounting provider has demonstrated consistent adherence to professional standards across the data sources Verdica monitors.
For a business owner or individual considering engaging Marilee Plunkett's services, a score of 827 signals low compliance risk based on available regulator data. It does not mean the provider is risk-free—no score does—but rather that the indexed regulatory record does not reveal material red flags. The score is derived entirely from objective regulator databases (state licensing boards and PCAOB findings), not subjective factors like price, customer service, or speed. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so the score reflects regulatory standing alone.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830): This sub-score evaluates whether Marilee Plunkett holds active, valid credentials in Missouri and whether those credentials carry any restrictions, suspensions, or sanctions from the state board. A score of 830 in this dimension indicates that licensing status is in good standing. In the accounting field, this dimension captures whether a CPA, EA, or other credential holder is properly registered, has completed continuing education requirements, and has not been subject to credential revocation or limitation by state regulators.
PCAOB Record (810): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains a database of audit quality findings from inspections of firms. A PCAOB score of 810 reflects the absence of material audit quality deficiencies or inspection findings that would suggest systemic control failures, inadequate technical expertise, or risk of misstatement in client audits. Lower scores in this dimension typically flag firms with documented inspection issues, repeated deficiency findings, or instances where audits failed to detect client control breakdowns.
Disciplinary (850): This is the highest possible sub-score and indicates no disciplinary actions indexed in the available regulatory record. Disciplinary records track complaints upheld against accounting providers—violations ranging from failure to comply with auditing standards, to mishandling of client funds, to fraud or ethical violations. A perfect score here means the regulator data does not show substantiated disciplinary action.
What regulators in MO track for accounting providers
Missouri's state board of accountancy issues and renews CPA licenses, enforces continuing professional education requirements, and investigates complaints. They maintain a public register of licensed practitioners and their credential status. Violations that lower a provider's standing with the state board include failure to renew credentials on time, non-compliance with ethics rules, inadequate record-keeping, and substantiated complaints from clients or other practitioners.
The PCAOB, a nonprofit corporation created under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, inspects accounting firms that audit public companies. Their inspections assess audit quality, adherence to auditing standards, and the adequacy of quality controls. Firms with systemic deficiencies or repeated findings of inadequate audit procedures face escalated scrutiny and potential enforcement action. Inspection results are published (with firm identifiers) and feed into Verdica's PCAOB sub-score.
Verdica indexes these regulator data sources to surface compliance patterns. An excellent score in all three dimensions suggests a provider without material licensing restrictions, PCAOB audit quality findings, or upheld disciplinary complaints—a low-risk regulatory profile.
Bottom line
Marilee Plunkett's score of 827 reflects an excellent compliance standing based on Missouri state licensing and PCAOB audit data. For a prospective client, this score indicates minimal regulatory red flags, though it does not speak to pricing, availability, or fit for specific services. Before engaging, cross-check her current Missouri CPA license status independently and confirm that her service offerings (audit, tax, bookkeeping, etc.) align with your needs.