What Verdica's 649 score means for Mary Hastings
Mary Hastings in Colorado holds a composite Verdica score of 649 out of 850, placing her in the "elevated risk" band (580–669). This score reflects mixed compliance and regulatory standing. While the score is above the high-risk threshold, it signals that prospective clients should conduct additional due diligence before engaging services.
A score in this range indicates the provider meets baseline regulatory requirements but carries meaningful compliance concerns that warrant attention. The gap between 649 and the "acceptable" threshold (670) is narrow—only 21 points—meaning a single regulatory improvement could shift the rating upward. Conversely, the distance from the "excellent" band (800+) is substantial, suggesting material gaps exist in either credentials, audit quality, or disciplinary record. Readers should interpret this score as a yellow flag rather than a red one: not necessarily disqualifying, but requiring verification and active monitoring.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (320 / 850): This is the primary driver of concern. A score of 320 in this dimension indicates significant gaps in professional licensing, certifications, or educational standing as tracked by state registration boards. In the accounting profession, this typically reflects missing or lapsed credentials, incomplete registration renewal, or failure to meet continuing education requirements. This sub-score alone places Mary Hastings substantially below benchmarks for this category.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board record is notably strong at 810, nearly in the "excellent" range. This suggests that any audits PCAOB has inspected—or relevant quality control measures on file—show limited or no significant deficiencies. A score this high typically means the provider has avoided major audit failures, material non-compliance findings, or repeated quality issues flagged by PCAOB inspections.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): A perfect score here indicates no known disciplinary actions, sanctions, or enforcement proceedings on record with state or federal regulators. This is a positive signal and suggests the provider has avoided regulatory censure, fines, license suspension, or public complaints substantiated by licensing boards.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB (which oversees public company auditors) maintain distinct but complementary oversight. The state board registers accounting providers and enforces licensing standards, including initial qualification exams, continuing professional education, and ethical conduct rules. Violations in this space—incomplete applications, expired licenses, or unmet education hours—directly impact the License & Credentials sub-score.
PCAOB inspections focus on audit quality and compliance with auditing standards. Inspectors examine workpapers, test control procedures, and assess whether firms followed generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS). Findings might include failures to obtain sufficient evidence, inadequate documentation, or deficient internal quality controls. These inspections produce reports that inform the PCAOB Record score. Major findings or repeated deficiencies would lower this score significantly.
Disciplinary records capture formal actions: license revocation or suspension, board sanctions, consent orders, or public censure. A perfect disciplinary score means the provider has avoided formal enforcement, though it does not guarantee the absence of complaints or concerns—only that no substantiated action reached a regulatory threshold.
Bottom line
Mary Hastings presents mixed compliance status. The strong PCAOB and perfect disciplinary records are positive, but the weak License & Credentials sub-score is a material concern that explains the overall elevated-risk classification. Before engaging this provider, verify current licensing status directly with the Colorado state board, confirm all required certifications are active, and request references from recent clients or audit committee members.