What Verdica's 656 score means for Mary Wiens
Mary Wiens's composite score of 656 out of 850 places her in the elevated risk band (580–669). This means her accounting practice shows some compliance strengths but also material gaps that warrant closer attention from clients or stakeholders relying on her services.
A score in this range indicates the provider meets baseline regulatory requirements—she holds valid credentials and maintains a PCAOB registration—but has enough documented issues or incomplete credentials to prevent a higher ranking. Clients should treat this score as a yellow flag: not a disqualification, but a signal to conduct additional due diligence before engagement. The score is built on hard regulatory data (PCAOB audit records and state board registration), not opinion, so it reflects documented compliance history rather than speculation.
The lack of independent customer reviews means Verdica has no user-submitted feedback to weigh alongside regulatory findings. This leaves the regulatory record as the primary basis for assessment.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (340 out of ~850 scale): This is the lowest of the three sub-scores and indicates a material shortfall in licensing, certifications, or credential documentation. In the accounting industry, this dimension typically reflects whether a provider holds current CPA licensure, required continuing education credits, or professional certifications aligned with the services they offer. A score of 340 suggests incomplete, expired, or missing credentials—or a mismatch between claimed services and documented qualifications. This is the primary driver holding Wiens's overall score in the elevated-risk range.
PCAOB Record (810 out of ~850 scale): This is a strong sub-score and represents Wiens's audit quality and compliance history as tracked by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. A score of 810 indicates she has passed recent PCAOB quality reviews without major findings, suggesting her audit work, documentation, and client service controls meet baseline standards. This is a meaningful positive signal and shows no large red flags in her regulatory inspection record.
Disciplinary (850 out of ~850 scale): A perfect or near-perfect score here means Wiens has no material disciplinary actions, complaints upheld, or sanctions on record with Washington state accounting regulators or the PCAOB. This suggests a clean compliance history in terms of formal enforcement; she has not been subject to fines, license suspensions, or public censure.
In summary: Wiens's strong PCAOB and disciplinary scores are offset by a significant gap in License & Credentials, creating an overall "elevated" picture.
What regulators in WA track for accounting providers
Washington state and the PCAOB monitor several dimensions of accounting provider quality:
PCAOB audit findings examine the quality of work performed on public company audits, including testing methodology, documentation, risk assessment, and compliance with auditing standards. Inspectors look for failures to detect material misstatements, inadequate evidence gathering, and control deficiencies. Providers with clean PCAOB records have demonstrated consistent adherence to these standards.
State board registration and licensing verify that accountants hold required CPA licenses, have met continuing education requirements, and are authorized to practice in Washington. The state board also tracks any disciplinary actions—including ethics complaints, billing disputes resolved against the provider, or license restrictions.
Disciplinary records include formal actions such as license suspension, public reprimand, fines, or corrective orders. A clean disciplinary score means the provider has not been found to have violated professional conduct standards or state accounting laws in a way serious enough to trigger regulatory intervention.
Together, these data sources give regulators and clients visibility into technical audit quality, credential validity, and ethical compliance.
Bottom line
Mary Wiens scores in the elevated-risk category due primarily to credential gaps, despite a clean disciplinary record and solid audit quality. Anyone considering her services should verify her current Washington CPA license, ensure her credentials match the scope of work needed, and request references or engagement agreements that specify audit standards and deliverables. Her PCAOB and disciplinary strength is a positive sign, but the credential issue should be resolved before engagement.