What Verdica's 820 score means for Megan Van Vleet
Megan Van Vleet's composite score of 820 out of 850 places her in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850), meaning she ranks in the top tier of accounting providers assessed through public regulatory data. This score reflects strong standing across the dimensions Verdica measures: state licensing, PCAOB audit quality records, and disciplinary history.
A score of 820 does not mean perfection or zero risk—the gap to a perfect 850 indicates room for improvement in at least one sub-category. However, for someone evaluating an accounting provider, this score signals that regulatory bodies have found no significant compliance failures and that quality indicators have remained solid. In practical terms, this is the type of score associated with providers who meet or exceed baseline expectations across their professional obligations.
What matters most is what this score does not indicate: it is not a red flag for disciplinary action, licensing problems, or audit findings that would suggest systemic quality issues. Readers should interpret this as a positive indicator when vetting providers, though—as with any professional service—it should be one factor among others like references, specific service offerings, and fee structure.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (810/850): This sub-score evaluates whether Megan Van Vleet holds valid, current credentials required to practice accounting in Colorado and whether her state board registration shows any compliance gaps. A score of 810 is strong and indicates her licensing status is in good standing. Scores in this range suggest the provider meets renewal requirements and has no record of credential suspension or significant compliance issues flagged by state regulators. A lower score would typically reflect late renewals, lapsed licenses, or unresolved compliance notices.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) conducts quality inspections of audit firms and tracks findings from those inspections. This sub-score reflects the results of PCAOB oversight, including any audit quality deficiencies identified during routine inspections. A score of 810 indicates that PCAOB inspections have not uncovered major systemic failures in audit methodology, documentation, or compliance. Scores drop when inspectors identify repeated control failures, inadequate audit procedures, or non-compliance with professional standards. A score this high suggests audits are generally being executed to professional standards.
Disciplinary (850/850): This is a perfect sub-score, meaning no disciplinary actions, complaints, or enforcement actions have been recorded against Megan Van Vleet in Verdica's indexed data from state or federal sources. This is the strongest possible indicator in this dimension and reflects a clean regulatory history.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state accounting board and the PCAOB maintain overlapping but distinct oversight functions. The state board focuses on licensing, renewal compliance, and adherence to professional standards within the state. They track whether providers maintain continuing education requirements, hold valid CPA licenses (if applicable), and respond to complaints.
The PCAOB, a federally chartered nonprofit, inspects registered accounting firms and tracks quality metrics. PCAOB inspections evaluate whether audits comply with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's rules, whether working papers are adequately documented, and whether firms have appropriate quality controls. When inspectors find deficiencies—such as insufficiently tested account balances, inadequate revenue recognition procedures, or gaps in audit documentation—those findings are recorded and can trigger follow-up inspections or enforcement actions.
Scores move downward when regulators identify compliance gaps, unresolved deficiencies, disciplinary complaints, or licensing issues. They move upward when providers demonstrate sustained compliance over time and clean inspection results.
Bottom line
Megan Van Vleet's 820 score reflects a strong regulatory standing with no significant red flags in licensing, audit quality, or discipline. Business owners or entities considering her services should view this as a positive compliance indicator, though they should also verify references, confirm service capabilities, and review engagement terms independently.