What Verdica's 820 score means for Michael Mrozek
Michael Mrozek's composite score of 820 out of 850 places him in Verdica's "excellent" range (800–850). This score reflects strong compliance performance across the dimensions Verdica tracks: professional licensing, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary record.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating an accounting provider, a score in this band signals low regulatory risk. It means the provider has maintained valid credentials, has not accumulated significant audit findings, and carries no material disciplinary flags in the systems Verdica monitors. A score of 820 is not perfect—the maximum is 850—but the gap is narrow enough that it reflects minor or no gaps rather than structural concerns.
The interpretation should be: this provider meets or exceeds baseline compliance expectations set by Colorado's state board and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). Someone considering engaging Michael Mrozek would be starting from a position of regulatory confidence, rather than needing to dig into risk mitigation upfront.
It's important to note that Verdica's score is based on public regulatory data, not customer satisfaction or quality of work. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so this score does not reflect client experience, responsiveness, or technical skill—only compliance standing.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (810/850): This sub-score reflects the status and validity of Michael Mrozek's professional licenses and certifications in Colorado. A score of 810 indicates that his licensing record is in good standing with no material gaps, lapses, or restrictions. In the accounting field, this typically means active CPA registration (or relevant credential) without suspension, revocation, or ongoing renewal issues. The slight gap from a perfect 850 may reflect routine administrative items or minor compliance notes rather than serious deficiencies.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The PCAOB audits accounting firms and tracks inspection findings related to audit quality and compliance with auditing standards. A score of 810 here suggests Michael Mrozek's firm (or his individual practice, depending on structure) has not accumulated significant deficiencies in PCAOB inspections. This could mean no findings, or findings that were quickly remediated and did not rise to the level of disciplinary referral. Firms with major or repeated audit quality issues receive lower scores in this dimension.
Disciplinary (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no active or historical disciplinary actions recorded by Colorado's accounting board or other tracked regulator systems. Disciplinary records typically capture complaints substantiated by regulators, ethics violations, fraud findings, or license sanctions. A perfect 850 means a clean record on this front.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's accounting board and the PCAOB maintain overlapping but distinct oversight functions. The state board enforces licensing requirements, continuing education mandates, and conduct standards for CPAs. Violations can include failure to renew, misrepresentation of credentials, fee disputes that escalate to ethics complaints, or violations of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct.
The PCAOB, a federal regulator, inspects accounting firms that audit public companies or broker-dealers. Its inspections focus on audit quality, compliance with auditing standards (AICPA and PCAOB standards), and work-paper documentation. Inspection findings—deficiencies in areas like revenue recognition, fair value measurement, or auditor independence—are tracked and publicized. Repeated or severe findings can trigger disciplinary referrals.
Verdica pulls from both sources to build a picture of regulatory compliance. Scores move up with clean inspection cycles, timely license renewals, and no substantiated complaints. Scores move down when findings accumulate, disciplinary actions are taken, or licensing lapses occur.
Bottom line
Michael Mrozek presents a low-risk profile based on public regulatory data, with an excellent compliance score and no disciplinary flags. Anyone considering his services should still verify the scope of services he offers matches their needs and seek references; this score speaks only to regulatory compliance, not to client experience or technical expertise.