What Verdica's 827 score means for Michelle Mann
Michelle Mann's composite score of 827 out of 850 places her in Verdica's excellent band (800–850). This means her profile reflects strong regulatory standing across the dimensions Verdica measures: licensing credentials, PCAOB audit history, and disciplinary records.
A score in this range indicates that a provider has met or exceeded baseline compliance expectations and has not triggered significant red flags in the systems regulators use to oversee accounting professionals. For a business owner or individual evaluating Mann as an accounting provider, this score suggests low regulatory risk based on available public data.
That said, the score reflects only what regulators and licensing boards have indexed. No independent customer reviews are yet available for Mann through Verdica's platform, so this analysis is limited to compliance metrics. A high score does not guarantee service quality, communication style, or fit for a specific client's needs—those require direct evaluation.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830/850): This sub-score reflects Mann's status with the Colorado state board and any relevant professional certifications. A score of 830 indicates that her licensing record is in good standing with minimal or no flags. In the accounting profession, this dimension tracks whether a provider holds required licenses (CPA, EA, or other designations), whether those licenses are current and unrestricted, and whether the state board has recorded any public actions against them.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspects and sanctions audit firms and auditors who work on public company engagements. A score of 810 reflects Mann's history in PCAOB's audit inspection system. This sub-score is typically high when an auditor has no findings, or when findings have been resolved without significant enforcement action. A lower score in this dimension would signal inspection deficiencies or unresolved audit quality issues.
Disciplinary (850/850): This is the strongest sub-score, indicating no public disciplinary actions on Mann's record in the systems Verdica monitors. Disciplinary records may include complaints, sanctions, or consent orders from state boards, the IRS, or federal agencies. A perfect 850 means no such actions appear in indexed regulatory data.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board of accountancy oversees licensing, continuing education compliance, and conduct standards for CPAs and other accounting professionals. They maintain registration records and can take disciplinary action for violations ranging from failure to maintain required certifications to violations of professional conduct rules.
The PCAOB, a federal regulator created under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, inspects firms that audit public companies. PCAOB inspections assess audit quality, including whether auditors followed professional standards, gathered sufficient evidence, and properly evaluated financial statement risks. Inspection findings can range from minor observations to significant deficiencies that require remediation plans or trigger enforcement.
Both systems publish findings and enforcement actions publicly. Verdica aggregates these data sources to signal whether a provider has a clean record or a history of regulatory attention. Scores move down when inspections identify deficiencies, when state boards issue disciplinary orders, or when certifications lapse or carry restrictions. Scores remain high when regulators find no violations and licenses remain active and unrestricted.
Bottom line
Michelle Mann's 827 score indicates strong regulatory compliance standing in Colorado. Before engaging her services, verify that her experience and service scope align with your needs, and consider requesting references—the regulatory score confirms she meets baseline standards, but does not speak to client outcomes or service delivery.