What Verdica's 642 score means for Nancy Kozeykina
Nancy Kozeykina's composite score of 642 out of 850 places her in the elevated risk band (580–669). This means her overall compliance profile sits above the high-risk threshold but notably below acceptable and stronger ranges.
For a business owner or financial stakeholder considering an accounting provider, a score in this band suggests caution is warranted. The provider is not in the clear, but they are not in the worst category either. The score reflects a mixed compliance picture: strong regulatory standing in some areas offset by material gaps in others. Before engaging this provider, you should understand what's driving the score and whether the weak areas affect your specific needs.
The fact that no independent customer reviews are indexed yet means Verdica's assessment relies entirely on regulator data—PCAOB audit findings and state board registration. This is the most objective available data, but it does not capture client satisfaction, responsiveness, or service quality.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (300 / 850): This is the critical weak point. A score of 300 is in the high-risk range and signals problems with professional standing, licensing status, or credential verification in Colorado. In the accounting field, this dimension typically reflects whether a provider holds valid CPA licensing, maintains required registrations with state boards, and has clean licensure history. A low score here suggests either lapsed credentials, licensing restrictions, or unresolved issues with the state board. This is a red flag that warrants direct verification before engagement.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): This is a strong score, indicating a clean or nearly clean history with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The PCAOB inspects accounting firms that audit public companies and issues quality control findings. A score of 810 suggests that audit quality, internal controls, and compliance with PCAOB standards have been solid. This is one of the few bright spots in the profile.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): A perfect score here means no disciplinary infractions on record with state or federal regulators. There are no documented violations, complaints upheld against the provider, or sanctions in the databases Verdica tracks. This is a positive indicator and suggests the provider has not had formal enforcement action taken.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board of accountancy maintains licensure and credential requirements for CPAs and accounting practitioners. They track whether providers maintain active licenses, meet continuing education obligations, and comply with professional standards. State boards also process and investigate complaints, and any disciplinary history becomes part of the public record.
The PCAOB, a federal regulator, focuses on firms that audit public company financial statements. They conduct triennial inspections, issue audit quality findings, and track whether firms remediate control deficiencies. High PCAOB findings can result in inspection reports that flag systemic issues, even if no formal discipline is imposed.
Verdica pulls from both sources. A provider with a low license score but strong PCAOB and disciplinary records suggests state-level credential problems—perhaps a lapsed license or unresolved registration issue—even though federal oversight and complaint history are clean. Conversely, strong PCAOB scores indicate the provider has met federal audit quality benchmarks.
Bottom line
Nancy Kozeykina's elevated-risk score (642) is driven by a significant credential or licensing issue in Colorado, despite clean federal audit records and no disciplinary infractions. Before engaging her services, verify her current Colorado licensing status directly with the state board and clarify what triggered the low credential score. The strong PCAOB and disciplinary marks are reassuring, but the license gap must be resolved to your satisfaction.