What Verdica's 656 score means for Peter Adamack
Peter Adamack's composite score of 656 out of 850 places him in the elevated risk band (580–669). This score reflects measurable strengths in regulatory compliance paired with meaningful gaps in credentials or licensing oversight.
A score in this range signals that the provider meets baseline operational standards but carries compliance factors that warrant additional scrutiny before engagement. For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, a 656 score means due diligence is warranted—this is not a high-risk red flag, but it is not a strong endorsement either. The score suggests Peter Adamack has passed fundamental PCAOB audit standards and has no disciplinary marks on record, but his licensing and credential profile needs review before making a commitment.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (340 / 850): This is the weakest component of Peter Adamack's profile. In accounting and auditing, credentials typically include CPA licensure, educational qualifications, and professional certifications. A sub-score of 340 indicates significant gaps in this dimension. This could reflect missing or expired certifications, incomplete credential documentation on file with Oklahoma's state board, or limited standing in specialized audit categories. This score alone is what prevents Peter Adamack from reaching an "acceptable" or higher overall rating.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): This score is strong. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board evaluates firms and practitioners on audit quality, compliance with auditing standards, and adherence to independence rules. A score of 810 suggests Peter Adamack has a solid PCAOB inspection history with few or no material findings. This is a bright spot in the profile and indicates routine audit work is conducted to regulatory standard.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): A perfect score here means there are no disciplinary actions, complaints, or enforcement findings recorded by Oklahoma's accounting board or federal oversight bodies. This reflects clean regulatory standing and suggests no history of ethics violations, client disputes, or corrective orders.
What regulators in OK track for accounting providers
Oklahoma's accounting oversight operates through the Oklahoma Accountancy Board and federal coordination with the PCAOB. Regulators track several dimensions:
Licensing & credentials are verified through the state board. CPAs must hold active licenses, maintain continuing education hours, and meet renewal requirements. Gaps here often signal lapses in compliance with ongoing professional development or failure to renew licenses on schedule.
PCAOB audit findings assess the quality of work on public company audits. The PCAOB conducts inspections and issues reports on deficiencies in audit execution, documentation, or adherence to standards like GAAS (Generally Accepted Auditing Standards). High PCAOB scores indicate few or minor findings; low scores reflect systemic quality issues.
Disciplinary records capture formal actions: license suspensions, revocations, consent orders, fines, or ethical violations. These are public and searchable. A clean disciplinary record is a baseline expectation; violations indicate serious regulatory concern.
These three dimensions together create a compliance profile. A provider with strong PCAOB and disciplinary scores but weak credentials may have good audit execution but incomplete or outdated professional standing. Conversely, a provider with excellent credentials but disciplinary history signals potential operational or ethical risk.
Bottom line
Peter Adamack scores in the elevated-risk band due primarily to credential and licensing gaps, offset by solid PCAOB audit performance and a clean disciplinary record. Before engaging him, verify current CPA licensure status with the Oklahoma Accountancy Board, confirm active standing in any relevant audit certifications, and request references from recent clients. This is a provider to vet thoroughly, not automatically exclude.