What Verdica's 827 score means for Randall Bartlett
Randall Bartlett's composite score of 827 out of 850 places this Colorado-based accounting provider in the "excellent" band (800–850), the highest performance tier in Verdica's assessment framework. This score reflects strong overall compliance standing across the three dimensions regulators and industry bodies track most closely: professional credentials, audit history, and disciplinary record.
A score in this range indicates that Verdica's underlying data sources—primarily PCAOB audit findings and Colorado state board registration records—show no material red flags. For a business owner or consumer evaluating an accounting provider, an 827 score suggests low regulatory risk and a track record aligned with professional standards. The 23-point gap from a perfect 850 is typical even among high-performing providers and does not signal serious concern; it reflects minor deviations or audit observations that fall within acceptable ranges for the profession.
It's worth noting that no independent customer reviews are indexed for this entity yet, so this score reflects regulatory compliance only, not client satisfaction or service quality metrics. Readers should treat this as one input in a broader due-diligence process.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (830): This sub-score measures whether Randall Bartlett holds valid, current licenses and professional certifications required to practice accounting in Colorado. A score of 830 indicates state board registration is in good standing with no suspension, revocation, or lapsed credentials on record. The 20-point deduction from a perfect 850 may reflect minor administrative matters—such as late renewal filings, continuing education reporting delays, or credential updates—that have been resolved or pose no active compliance risk.
PCAOB Record (810): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains inspection records on firms that audit public companies. This sub-score of 810 reflects Randall Bartlett's performance history in PCAOB audits and inspections. A score at this level indicates no material weaknesses or repeated audit deficiencies. The 40-point gap from perfect may indicate observations in prior audit findings—areas where the PCAOB noted room for improvement in audit quality, documentation, or adherence to auditing standards—but nothing systemic or unresolved.
Disciplinary (850): This is a perfect score, meaning there are no disciplinary actions, complaints, or enforcement records tied to this entity in Colorado's regulatory database. No censures, fines, or sanctions appear in the underlying source data.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's Division of Professions and the PCAOB together establish the compliance framework for accounting providers operating in the state. The PCAOB, a non-profit corporation established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, conducts periodic inspections of firms auditing public companies. These inspections focus on audit quality, adherence to auditing standards, and internal quality control systems. Findings may include documentation gaps, insufficient evidence of audit procedures, or weaknesses in staff training—issues that trigger scoring deductions but do not necessarily indicate fraud or gross negligence.
State board registration, tracked by Colorado's licensing authority, verifies that practitioners meet education requirements, pass competency exams, and maintain continuing professional education hours. Disciplinary records capture formal complaints, investigations, and enforcement actions initiated by the state. These might include client disputes, billing irregularities, or violations of professional conduct rules.
Verdica weights these three dimensions to produce a composite that reflects both technical competence (credentials, audit findings) and ethical standing (disciplinary history). A provider with excellent credentials but a disciplinary record would score lower than one with clean standing across all three.
Bottom line
Randall Bartlett's 827 score places this provider in the top regulatory compliance tier with no disciplinary history and strong credentials and audit performance. For business owners considering engagement, this score suggests low regulatory risk; cross-check current state licensing status and request client references or engagement samples to assess service quality independently.