What Verdica's 813 score means for Samuel Brown
Samuel Brown's composite score of 813 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the "excellent" band (800–850), indicating strong overall compliance standing across the measured dimensions. A score at this level suggests that the provider meets or exceeds baseline regulatory expectations and has demonstrated consistent adherence to professional standards tracked by both the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and Colorado state licensing authorities.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, an 813 score signals low compliance risk relative to the broader population of accounting service providers. The gap of 37 points from a perfect score reflects minor areas where performance could theoretically improve, but does not suggest material deficiencies or red flags. This is a provider where regulatory records do not surface substantial concerns—a meaningful distinction in an industry where public oversight exists precisely to protect client interests.
The absence of indexed customer reviews means potential clients cannot yet cross-reference regulatory data with real-world user experience. This is neither a positive nor a negative indicator on its own; it simply means the compliance picture is based solely on regulator filings and board records. Readers should treat the 813 as a strong regulatory baseline, not a complete due-diligence conclusion.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (790): This sub-score reflects Samuel Brown's current state board registration and professional qualification status in Colorado. A score of 790 in this dimension indicates the provider holds valid licensure and meets educational or certification benchmarks required by state regulators. It is not perfect (850), suggesting either a minor lapse in renewal timing, a credential that is current but not at the highest tier, or some other marginal variance from optimal standing. In practical terms, 790 signals the provider is legally authorized to practice and meets baseline competency standards—a non-negotiable floor for any accounting provider.
PCAOB Record (810): The PCAOB oversees auditors of public companies and maintains inspection records documenting audit quality and compliance with standards. A score of 810 here indicates Samuel Brown's audit work (if applicable) or registered firm activity has not surfaced significant findings in PCAOB inspections. Minor findings in PCAOB audits—such as documentation gaps or technical non-compliance—can lower this score without indicating fraud or incompetence. This score suggests reliable audit execution and adherence to professional standards as measured by federal oversight.
Disciplinary (850): This perfect sub-score means no disciplinary actions, complaints substantiated by state boards, or sanctions are indexed in the underlying data. This is the most straightforward metric: absence of formal discipline at the state level. A perfect score here is meaningful because it reflects a clean formal record—no fines, suspensions, or complaints resolved against the provider.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB monitor accounting providers through distinct but complementary mechanisms. State licensing boards track initial qualification, renewal compliance, and disciplinary matters (complaints, ethical violations, fraud). The PCAOB, by contrast, focuses on audit quality for public company engagements, issuing inspection reports that identify deficiencies in audit documentation, evidence gathering, or technical compliance with auditing standards.
Verdica's scoring model weights these regulator data sources to reflect both the credentialing dimension (is the provider licensed and qualified?) and the execution dimension (does their work product meet professional standards?). Low scores in any sub-category typically surface issues like lapsed licenses, substantiated complaints, failed PCAOB inspections, or disciplinary action. High scores reflect current, good standing across these measures.
Bottom line
Samuel Brown presents a low-risk compliance profile with an 813 composite score, supported by strong sub-scores across licensing, audit record, and disciplinary history. Anyone considering engaging this provider should review the score as a regulatory green light, but should still conduct customary due diligence—verify references, confirm current engagement capacity, and understand pricing and scope—since regulatory compliance and service fit are separate questions.