What Verdica's 803 score means for Tucker Powers
Tucker Powers in Colorado has earned a composite Verdica score of 803 out of 850, placing the entity in the "excellent" band (800–850 range). This score reflects strong overall compliance standing across the three regulatory dimensions Verdica tracks: licensing credentials, PCAOB audit findings, and disciplinary history.
For a prospective client or stakeholder, a score in this range signals that Tucker Powers has demonstrated consistent adherence to accounting industry standards as measured by public records. The 47-point gap between this score and the maximum possible reflects room for refinement in one or more compliance areas, but does not indicate serious risk. A reader should interpret this as a low-risk provider from a regulatory standpoint, suitable for most business contexts where compliance history is a consideration. The score is drawn exclusively from regulator databases—PCAOB records and Colorado state board registration—rather than customer opinion, so it reflects institutional performance rather than service quality or satisfaction metrics.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (760/850): This sub-score evaluates whether Tucker Powers holds active, unrestricted licenses and required certifications under Colorado state accounting board rules. A score of 760 indicates the provider meets baseline licensing requirements but may have minor credential gaps, renewal timing issues, or specialization limitations when cross-referenced against state records. High scores in this dimension mean full active licensing; lower scores flag lapses, restrictions, or incomplete credential renewals.
PCAOB Record (810/850): The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains inspection and audit findings for firms that audit public companies or broker-dealers. Tucker Powers' score of 810 reflects audit quality and compliance outcomes tracked through PCAOB inspections. Higher scores in this category indicate fewer deficiencies noted in audit work, better documentation practices, and stronger quality controls. A score in the 800s typically means any findings were minor or quickly remediated, rather than systemic audit methodology issues.
Disciplinary (850/850): This is a perfect sub-score, indicating no formal disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions on file with Colorado state regulators or the PCAOB during the period covered by Verdica's data. A score of 850 means a clean public record—no license suspensions, fines, consent orders, or substantiated complaints that entered the official record. This is the strongest possible position in this dimension.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board of accountancy maintains registration records for CPAs and accounting firms, verifying ongoing education, license renewal status, and any disciplinary matters. The PCAOB, a federal authority created under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, conducts regular inspections of audit firms and documents findings in areas such as audit file documentation, quality control procedures, technical accounting knowledge, and engagement supervision. These inspections can result in deficiencies ranging from minor (isolated documentation gaps) to significant (systemic audit methodology failures).
Verdica's scoring methodology weighs these regulator data sources because they represent independent, third-party verification of compliance. Infractions that lower scores might include: incomplete continuing education hours, late license renewals, audit documentation deficiencies noted by PCAOB, quality control weaknesses, disciplinary complaints substantiated by state boards, or PCAOB inspection findings requiring corrective action. Conversely, scores improve with clean inspection results, timely license renewals, and absence of disciplinary history.
Bottom line
Tucker Powers represents a low-compliance-risk choice based on regulator records, with a strong PCAOB record and a clean disciplinary history. Anyone considering an engagement should still verify references, scope alignment, and service fit—this score addresses regulatory standing only, not service capabilities or pricing. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed, so direct reference checks remain important.